LINGUIST List 20.3276|
Mon Sep 28 2009
Sum: Responses for Consonant Cluster Typology
Editor for this issue: Elyssa Winzeler
To post to LINGUIST, use our convenient web form at
Responses for Consonant Cluster Typology
Message 1: Responses for Consonant Cluster Typology
From: Steve Parker <steve_parkergial.edu>
Subject: Responses for Consonant Cluster Typology
E-mail this message to a friend
Query for this summary posted in LINGUIST Issue: 20.3119
This is a follow up to a query I submitted on September 15, 2009,
summarizing the responses that I have received to date. The topic is
consonant cluster typology. Specifically, I asked for information and
resources to help answer the question, within complex tautosyllabic onset
clusters, which type of consonant sequence is cross-linguistically unmarked
or preferred: obstruent plus liquid, such as /pl/, or obstruent plus glide,
such as /tw/?
(1) Herb Stahlke of Ball State University wrote:
Interesting project. As you note, you will find complexities with the OL
clusters. Some of the Idomoid languages appear to have such clusters, but
they in fact count as disyllabic. The liquid bears a tone, high or low.
Stem vowels in these languages can typically be high, mid, or low. With
/l/ the tone shows up on the liquid. With /r/ there is a very short
epenthetic vowel between O and L, and the vowel bears the tone.
(2) Shigeto Kawahara of Rutgers University wrote:
One case that I can offer is Japanese, although there are some
complications. One thing that is clear is that Japanese never allows OL
clusters. The pronunciation of English loanwords shows that Japanese
speakers split up the cluster, like: try=> [torai]; cluster =>[kurasutaa].
Japanese on the other hand also has so-called 'yoo-on', which can either
be analyzed as CG clusters or palatalized C. I do not know any good
argument for one way or another. Bloch's original analysis (1950, Language)
treats them as CG clusters. Vance (1987) 'An introduction to Japanese
phonology' seems to agree with this position, when he introduces Hattori's
theory (p. 64). Other theories treat yoo-on as palatalized consonants, but
usually without arguments. At any rate, Japanese does not allow Cw clusters
(or 'labialized Cs').
Another set of references that may be useful is the debate between Broselow
and Finer (1992) and Eckman and Iverson (1992), both of which appeared in
Second Language Research. They observe patterns of second language
acquisition in terms of different types of clusters. If I remember
correctly, Eckman and Iverson take the Clementian position and Broselow and
Finer take the Steriadian position.
I realize that this Japanese case is not super clear-cut, but I hope it
[Later Shigeto wrote back again, with the following:]
OK, now about 'yoo-on' in Japanese--being curious myself, I've asked
Osamu Fujimura whether he knows some arguments against one position or the
other. He was of the opinion that yoo-on should be treated as clusters for
the following reason. [j] cannot appear before front vowels in Japanese
([ja, ju, jo] vs. *[ji, je]). Neither can the yoo-on contrast: we know that
before [i] the consonants are (perhaps phonetically) palatalized in the
first place so that we do not have a contrast between [kja] and [ka]--we
only have [kja]. If we treat yoo-on as clusters, then we can treat these
two restrictions as one generalization 'the [j]-zero contrast cannot
appear before front vowels'.
I am not sure if this argument is terribly persuasive because we can
consider yoo-on as palatalized consonants ([+palatal]) and posit a
constraint *[+palatal]-[-back], assuming that [j] is also [+palatal].
(3) Daniela Muller of the Université de Toulouse wrote:
In response to your query on LINGUIST List, I would like to draw your
attention to sound change, since the direction it takes may help answer
your questions. For example, /kla, gla, pla, bla/ change into /kja, gja,
pja, bja/ in most Romance dialects and some Tai dialects. In Proto-Slavic
/pja, bja/ change into /pla, bla/.
For a language with a wide variety of onset clusters, I suggest Greek (both
Modern and Ancient). Any dictionary should give an impression of the
permissible clusters in this language.
Lastly, the sonority scale itself, as you probably know, is a highly
debated concept. The following two articles critically examine this issue:
Ohala, John J. & Haruko Kawasaki (1984), Prosodic phonology and phonetics.
In Phonology Yearbook 1; 113-127.
Ohala, John J. & Haruko Kawasaki-Fukumori (1997), Alternatives to the
sonority hierarchy for explaining segmental sequential constraints. In Stig
Eliasson & Ernst Håkon Jahr (Eds.), Language And Its Ecology: Essays In
Memory Of Einar Haugen. Trends in Linguistics. Studies and Monographs, Vol.
100. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter; 343-365.
(4) Caren Brinkmann in Germany wrote:
The lexical database CELEX contains phonetic transcriptions and frequency
information for very entry in English, Dutch, and German:
Its coding can be quite daunting, so let me know if you need any help.
(5) Boyan Nikolaev of the University of Sofia wrote:
If you are also interested in cases where a sonorant, as r, l or m, is
involved, I think I can provide a handful of examples from Bulgaria and
other South Slav languages. By the way -and that I know purely by chance-
in Swahili the word for 'a child' is mtoto.
Steve Parker again: many thanks to these colleagues for their helpful replies.
Linguistic Field(s): Phonology
Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issue
Please report any bad links or misclassified data
LINGUIST Homepage | Read
LINGUIST | Contact us
While the LINGUIST List makes every effort to ensure the linguistic relevance of sites listed
on its pages, it cannot vouch for their contents.