* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
LINGUIST List logo Eastern Michigan University Wayne State University *
* People & Organizations * Jobs * Calls & Conferences * Publications * Language Resources * Text & Computer Tools * Teaching & Learning * Mailing Lists * Search *
* *
LINGUIST List 20.3368

Tue Oct 06 2009

TOC: Theoretical Linguistics 35/2-3 (2009)

Editor for this issue: Fatemeh Abdollahi <fatemehlinguistlist.org>

Directory
        1.    Julia Ulrich, Theoretical Linguistics Vol 35, No 2-3 (2009)

Message 1: Theoretical Linguistics Vol 35, No 2-3 (2009)
Date: 05-Oct-2009
From: Julia Ulrich <julia.ulrichdegruyter.com>
Subject: Theoretical Linguistics Vol 35, No 2-3 (2009)
E-mail this message to a friend

Publisher: Mouton de Gruyter
http://www.mouton-publishers.com

Journal Title: Theoretical Linguistics
Volume Number: 35
Issue Number: 2-3
Issue Date: 2009


Main Text:

Theoretical Linguistics
Volume: 35, Number: 2-3 (October 2009)

The above issue is now available online from Walter de Gruyter at:
http://www.reference-global.com/toc/thli/2009/35/2-3?ai=12h&ui=w6&af=H

A constraint on copy deletion
Tue Trinh

Delete: A phase-level property
Enoch O. Aboh

Comments on Tue Trinh (2009) A constraint on copy deletion
Josef Bayer

Commentary: When is a Copy not (a Copy)?
Nigel Duffield

Predicate doubling and VP-topicalisation in German
Roland Hinterhölzl

V-movement in affirmative replies and copy deletion
Anders Holmberg

Interpreting the CCD prosodically
Shinichiro Ishihara

Notes on partial fronting and copy spell-out
Gereon Müller

Comments on the syntax and prosody of German verbs
Hubert Truckenbrodt


Linguistic Field(s): Linguistic Theories
                            Philosophy of Language
                            Syntax

Subject Language(s): German, Standard (deu)

Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issue




Please report any bad links or misclassified data

LINGUIST Homepage | Read LINGUIST | Contact us

NSF Logo

While the LINGUIST List makes every effort to ensure the linguistic relevance of sites listed
on its pages, it cannot vouch for their contents.