* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
LINGUIST List logo Eastern Michigan University Wayne State University *
* People & Organizations * Jobs * Calls & Conferences * Publications * Language Resources * Text & Computer Tools * Teaching & Learning * Mailing Lists * Search *
* *
LINGUIST List 20.3799

Fri Nov 06 2009

Books: Pragmatics/Discourse Analysis: Tseronis

Editor for this issue: Hannah Morales <hannahlinguistlist.org>


Links to the websites of all LINGUIST's supporting publishers are available at the end of this issue.
Directory
        1.    MariĆ«tte Bonenkamp, Qualifying Standpoints, Stance Adverbs as a Presentational Device for Managing the Burden of Proof: Tseronis

Message 1: Qualifying Standpoints, Stance Adverbs as a Presentational Device for Managing the Burden of Proof: Tseronis
Date: 03-Nov-2009
From: Mariƫtte Bonenkamp <lotuu.nl>
Subject: Qualifying Standpoints, Stance Adverbs as a Presentational Device for Managing the Burden of Proof: Tseronis
E-mail this message to a friend

Title: Qualifying Standpoints, Stance Adverbs as a Presentational Device
for Managing the Burden of Proof
Series Title: LOT Dissertation Series
Published: 2009
Publisher: Netherlands Graduate School of Linguistics / Landelijke - LOT
                http://www.lotpublications.nl/

Author: Assimakis Tseronis
Paperback: ISBN: 9789460930058 Pages: Price: ----
Abstract:

A number of studies from pragmatics and discourse analysis have
investigated the function of stance adverbs, such as clearly, fortunately,
frankly, perhaps, and technically, when used to qualify utterances. Within
the field of argumentation studies, scholars who have paid attention to
these words have primarily focused on the so-called modal adverbs, and have
not considered the insights that can be gained by treating the class of
stance adverbs as the linguistic realisation of a certain move in an
argumentative discussion. This study aims to fill this gap by investigating
the strategic function of stance adverbs when qualifying an utterance that
functions as a standpoint.

In this study stance adverbs are examined as a presentational device at the
arguer's disposal when putting forward a standpoint. Assuming the
pragma-dialectical approach to the study of argumentation, the aim is to
specify how qualifying a standpoint helps arguers to pursue their
rhetorical goals without overriding the dialectical requirements pertaining
to an argumentative discussion. The study is comprised of three parts. In
the first part, the question 'What is a qualified standpoint?' is answered
by combining illocutionary analysis of the move of advancing a standpoint
with pragma-linguistic study of stance adverbs. In the second part, the
question 'Why would the protagonist qualify the standpoint?' is answered
based on the concept of burden of proof, which is essential to the move of
advancing a standpoint. In the third part, the question 'How does
standpoint qualification function strategically in an argumentative
discussion?' is answered by postulating that the protagonist of a qualified
standpoint is interested in managing the burden of proof, an assumption
which builds on the results of the other two parts.

The book is of interest to advanced students and scholars of argumentation
and communication studies as well as those interested in an explanation of
language use from an argumentative perspective.

Linguistic Field(s): Discourse Analysis
                            Pragmatics

Written In: English (eng )

See this book announcement on our website:
http://linguistlist.org/get-book.html?BookID=44270


Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issue

-------------- Major Supporters --------------
Brill http://www.brill.nl
Cambridge Scholars Publishing http://www.c-s-p.org
Cambridge University Press http://us.cambridge.org
Cascadilla Press http://www.cascadilla.com/
Continuum International Publishing Group Ltd http://www.continuumbooks.com
De Gruyter Mouton http://www.mouton-publishers.com
Edinburgh University Press http://www.eup.ed.ac.uk/
Elsevier Ltd http://www.elsevier.com/linguistics
Emerald Group Publishing Limited http://www.emeraldinsight.com/
Equinox Publishing Ltd http://www.equinoxpub.com/
European Language Resources Association - ELRA http://www.elra.info.
Georgetown University Press http://www.press.georgetown.edu
Hodder Education http://www.hoddereducation.co.uk
John Benjamins http://www.benjamins.com/
Lincom GmbH http://www.lincom.eu
MIT Press http://mitpress.mit.edu/
Multilingual Matters http://www.multilingual-matters.com/
Narr Francke Attempto Verlag GmbH + Co. KG http://www.narr.de/
Oxford University Press http://www.oup.com/us
Palgrave Macmillan http://www.palgrave.com
Peter Lang AG http://www.peterlang.com
Rodopi http://www.rodopi.nl/
Routledge (Taylor and Francis) http://www.routledge.com/
Springer http://www.springer.com
University of Toronto Press http://www.utpjournals.com/
Wiley-Blackwell http://www.wiley.com

------------- Other Supporting Publishers -------------
Association of Editors of the Journal of Portuguese Linguistics http://www.fl.ul.pt/revistas/JPL/JPLweb.htm
Graduate Linguistic Students' Association, Umass http://glsa.hypermart.net/
International Pragmatics Assoc. http://www.ipra.be
Langues et Linguistique http://y.ennaji.free.fr/fr/
Linguistic Association of Finland http://www.ling.helsinki.fi/sky/
Netherlands Graduate School of Linguistics / Landelijke - LOT http://www.lotpublications.nl/
Pacific Linguistics http://pacling.anu.edu.au/
SIL International http://www.ethnologue.com/bookstore.asp
St. Jerome Publishing Ltd http://www.stjerome.co.uk
Utrecht institute of Linguistics http://www-uilots.let.uu.nl/




Please report any bad links or misclassified data

LINGUIST Homepage | Read LINGUIST | Contact us

NSF Logo

While the LINGUIST List makes every effort to ensure the linguistic relevance of sites listed
on its pages, it cannot vouch for their contents.