LINGUIST List 20.3968
|
Wed Nov 18 2009
Qs: Source for 'Mapping' Definition
Editor for this issue: Elyssa Winzeler
<elyssa linguistlist.org>
|
We'd like to remind readers that the responses to queries are usually best posted to the individual asking the question. That individual is then strongly encouraged to post a summary to the list. This policy was
instituted to help control the huge volume of mail on LINGUIST; so we would appreciate your cooperating with it whenever it seems appropriate.
In addition to posting a summary, we'd like to remind people that it is usually a good idea to personally thank those individuals who have taken the trouble to respond to the query.
To post to LINGUIST, use our convenient web form at http://linguistlist.org/LL/posttolinguist.html.
|
Directory
1. Helena
Frannhag,
Source for 'Mapping' Definition
Message 1: Source for 'Mapping' Definition
|
Date: 17-Nov-2009
From: Helena Frannhag <frannhag hotmail.com>
Subject: Source for 'Mapping' Definition
E-mail this message to a friend
Hi, I'm trying to define the term 'mapping', and somewhere in the back of my mind I know that there is, somewhere in the literature, an excellent analogy of mapping as putting transparencies on top of each other, thereby giving rise to a non-compositional, merged picture, which is something beyond the mere sum of the parts. I have a feeling that it's Langacker who's made this analogy, but I'm not altogether sure, and anyways, even if it is him, he's written a bit too much to go through it all to find this quote. :-) I would be immensely grateful to anyone who could help me with this - either if you know what I'm talking about and know where I can find it, or if you have any other references to suggest. Best Helena
Linguistic Field(s):
Cognitive Science
Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issue
|
|

Please report any bad links or misclassified data
LINGUIST Homepage | Read
LINGUIST | Contact us

While the LINGUIST List makes every effort to ensure the linguistic relevance of sites listed on its pages, it cannot vouch for their contents.
|
|