LINGUIST List 20.3973
|
Thu Nov 19 2009
Diss: Historical Ling: Blakemore: 'Intend Returning: Um estudo...'
Editor for this issue: Di Wdzenczny
<di linguistlist.org>
|
To post to LINGUIST, use our convenient web form at
http://linguistlist.org/LL/posttolinguist.html.
|
Directory
1. Heather
Blakemore,
Intend Returning: Um estudo diacrônico de complementos indefinidos na língua inglesa, baseado em dados de corpora
Message 1: Intend Returning: Um estudo diacrônico de complementos indefinidos na língua inglesa, baseado em dados de corpora
|
Date: 17-Nov-2009
From: Heather Blakemore <Heather.Blakemore gmail.com>
Subject: Intend Returning: Um estudo diacrônico de complementos indefinidos na língua inglesa, baseado em dados de corpora
E-mail this message to a friend
Institution: Federal University of Minas Gerais
Program: Linguistics Post-Graduate Programme
Dissertation Status: Completed
Degree Date: 2009
Author: Heather Jean Blakemore
Dissertation Title: Intend Returning: Um estudo diacrônico de complementos indefinidos na língua inglesa, baseado em dados de corpora
Dissertation URL: http://www.letras.ufmg.br/poslin/tese_detalhes.asp?aluno=681
Linguistic Field(s):
Historical Linguistics
Subject Language(s): English (eng)
Dissertation Director:
Heliana Mello
Dissertation Abstract:
Starting from the chaos of contemporary synchronic data, I sought patterns in usage of indefinite verbal complements in the form of gerunds and infinitives. The methodology employed a personalized database built from relevant corpora. Analyses utilized Cognitive Grammar (Langacker, 1987, 1991, 2000) with Usage-based Models of Language (Barlow & Kemmer, 2000). Extensive study of the literature on the question led to the conviction that existing analyses of synchronic contemporary data could receive substantial illumination from diachronic corpus data. Consequently, research was extended to historical uses of these verbal complements, resulting in the discovery of complex and interacting changes in English syntax. Growth of the gerund complement in both token and construction types was verified as a change in progress. The two factors identified as having the greatest explanatory power over the current system of verbal complements are respectively historical and contemporary, specifically certain verbs' later entry into English and current frequency rates of use. I introduce a Kemmer-type feedback loop mechanism of language change to explain the two factors according to the hypothesis that the first factor is partially responsible for the second. Taken together, the factors and the mechanism form the most significant contribution offered by this original research: a historical explanation of the processes resulting in current differences between the two forms, both in meaning and syntactic distribution.
Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issue
|
|

Please report any bad links or misclassified data
LINGUIST Homepage | Read
LINGUIST | Contact us

While the LINGUIST List makes every effort to ensure the linguistic relevance of sites listed on its pages, it cannot vouch for their contents.
|
|