* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
LINGUIST List logo Eastern Michigan University Wayne State University *
* People & Organizations * Jobs * Calls & Conferences * Publications * Language Resources * Text & Computer Tools * Teaching & Learning * Mailing Lists * Search *
* *
LINGUIST List 20.3974

Thu Nov 19 2009

Diss: Phonology: Hall: 'The Role and Representation of Contrast in...'

Editor for this issue: Di Wdzenczny <dilinguistlist.org>

To post to LINGUIST, use our convenient web form at http://linguistlist.org/LL/posttolinguist.html.
        1.    Daniel Hall, The Role and Representation of Contrast in Phonological Theory

Message 1: The Role and Representation of Contrast in Phonological Theory
Date: 18-Nov-2009
From: Daniel Hall <daniel.hallutoronto.ca>
Subject: The Role and Representation of Contrast in Phonological Theory
E-mail this message to a friend

Institution: University of Toronto
Program: Department of Linguistics
Dissertation Status: Completed
Degree Date: 2007

Author: Daniel Currie Hall

Dissertation Title: The Role and Representation of Contrast in Phonological Theory

Dissertation URL: http://twpl.library.utoronto.ca/index.php/twpl/article/view/6497

Linguistic Field(s): Phonology

Dissertation Director:
B. Elan Dresher

Dissertation Abstract:

This dissertation deals with the role of phonemic contrast in determining
the featural content of phonological relations, and with the relation
between phonemic and phonetic contrasts. Chapter one provides an
introduction to the contrastivist hypothesis, which holds that phonological
computation operates only on those features necessary to distinguish the
phonemes of a language from one another, and argues that the Continuous
Dichotomy Hypothesis of Dresher, Piggott, and Rice (1994) provides the best
means of identifying features as contrastive or redundant. The next two
chapters analyze data on voicing assimilation in Czech, Slovak, Polish, and
Russian (chapter 2), and on vowel harmony in Yowlumne and Pulaar (chapter
3) that present particular challenges to the contrastivist hypothesis; here
it is argued that although redundant features are sometimes crucially
present in phonological representations, they do not need to be
phonologically active. The data are analyzed using contrastive
specifications supplemented by the novel device of prophylactic features,
which are redundant features carrying information that is necessary for the
phonetic realization of segments, but not for the phonological computation
itself. Along the way, comparisons are drawn with analyses that incorporate
more detailed phonetic information into the phonological representations,
and the advantages of the underspecification approach are revealed. Chapter
4 considers the interaction between phonemic contrast and phonetic
distinctness in determining the shapes of phonological inventories. It
offers a critical view of some phonetically presents as an alternative a
view in which abstract and minimal phonological representations of phonemic
contrasts lead to phonetically distinct surface realizations through the
synchronic mechanism of phonetic enhancement and the diachronic influence
of the acquisition procedure. Finally, chapter 5 explores the degree to
which contrastive specification is compatible with Optimality Theory
(Prince and Smolensky 1993). Some of the insights of the contrastivist
hypothesis can be maintained in Optimality Theory through the translation
of a contrastive feature hierarchy into a constraint ranking, but
contrastive specification is ultimately at odds with the Optimality
Theoretic principle of Richness of the Base and the assumptions that
underlie it. The main points of the dissertation are summarized in chapter 6.

Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issue

Please report any bad links or misclassified data

LINGUIST Homepage | Read LINGUIST | Contact us

NSF Logo

While the LINGUIST List makes every effort to ensure the linguistic relevance of sites listed
on its pages, it cannot vouch for their contents.