LINGUIST List 20.441
|
Wed Feb 11 2009
FYI: Online survey on practices in annotation
Editor for this issue: Matthew Lahrman
<matt linguistlist.org>
|
To post to LINGUIST, use our convenient web form at
http://linguistlist.org/LL/posttolinguist.html.
|
Directory
1. Katrin
Tomanek,
Online survey on practices in annotation
Message 1: Online survey on practices in annotation
|
Date: 11-Feb-2009
From: Katrin Tomanek <katrin.tomanek uni-jena.de>
Subject: Online survey on practices in annotation
E-mail this message to a friend
Online survey on common practices in the annotation of training material for Natural Language Processing: This survey aims at investigating annotation practices used for the creation of training material for statistical approaches to Natural Language Processing (NLP). More specifically, we want to study to which extent and in which scenarios Active Learning (AL) is used to reduce annotation costs, as well as addressing the reasons to why (or why not) AL has been found applicable to a specific task. The survey targets participants who were or are currently involved in the annotation of training material for any kind of NLP task. The questionnaire takes only few minutes. Results will be available online or sent to participants by email if desired. Please feel free to forward this message to anyone you think might be interested in the survey. To access the survey just click on the link below or copy it to your browser: http://www.questionpro.com/akira/TakeSurvey?id=1143778 The survey is open now until Feb 20, 2009. Thanks in advance for your participation, Katrin & Fredrik -------------------------------------------------- Katrin Tomanek, JULIE Lab, Germany Fredrik Olsson, SICS, Sweden Linguistic Field(s): Computational Linguistics Text/Corpus Linguistics
Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issue
|
|

Please report any bad links or misclassified data
LINGUIST Homepage | Read
LINGUIST | Contact us

While the LINGUIST List makes every effort to ensure the linguistic relevance of sites listed on its pages, it cannot vouch for their contents.
|
|