* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
LINGUIST List logo Eastern Michigan University Wayne State University *
* People & Organizations * Jobs * Calls & Conferences * Publications * Language Resources * Text & Computer Tools * Teaching & Learning * Mailing Lists * Search *
* *
LINGUIST List 20.4418

Sun Dec 20 2009

TOC: Phonology 26/3 (2009)

Editor for this issue: Fatemeh Abdollahi <fatemehlinguistlist.org>

Directory
        1.    Daniel Davies, Phonology Vol 26, No 3 (2009)

Message 1: Phonology Vol 26, No 3 (2009)
Date: 19-Nov-2009
From: Daniel Davies <ddaviescambridge.org>
Subject: Phonology Vol 26, No 3 (2009)
E-mail this message to a friend

Publisher: Cambridge University Press
http://us.cambridge.org

Journal Title: Phonology
Volume Number: 26
Issue Number: 3
Issue Date: 2009


Main Text:

Articles

Japanese mimetic palatalisation revisited: implications for conflicting
directionality
John Alderete, Alexei Kochetov

Locality in metrical typology
Eugene Buckley

Palatalisability via feature compatibility
Kazutaka Kurisu

Durational correlates of English sublexical constituent structure
Mariko Sugahara, Alice Turk

Book Reviews

Jan-Olof Svantesson, Anna Tsendina, Anastasia Karlsson and Vivan Franzén (2005).
The phonology of Mongolian. (The Phonology of the World's Languages.) Oxford:
Oxford University Press. Pp. xix+314.
Andrew Nevins

Review Articles

Aniruddh D. Patel (2008). Music, language, and the brain. Oxford: Oxford
University Press. Pp. xi+513.
Laura Dilley

Contributors

German fricatives: coda devoicing or positional faithfulness? – ERRATUM

Notes for contributors

PHO volume 26 issue 3 Cover and Front matter

PHO volume 26 issue 3 Cover and Back matter


Linguistic Field(s): Phonology
                            Typology
                            Morphology

Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issue




Please report any bad links or misclassified data

LINGUIST Homepage | Read LINGUIST | Contact us

NSF Logo

While the LINGUIST List makes every effort to ensure the linguistic relevance of sites listed
on its pages, it cannot vouch for their contents.