Editor for this issue: Dan Parker
<danlinguistlist.org>
We'd like to remind readers that the responses to queries are usually best posted to the individual asking the question. That individual is then strongly encouraged to post a summary to the list. This policy was
instituted to help control the huge volume of mail on LINGUIST; so we would appreciate your cooperating with it whenever it seems appropriate.
In addition to posting a summary, we'd like to remind people that it is usually a good idea to personally thank those individuals who have taken the trouble to respond to the query.
Date: 15-Feb-2009 From: Andrew Swearingen <andrew.swearingenling-phil.ox.ac.uk> Subject: Imperative Morphology E-mail this message to a friend
I am currently a doctoral student writing on Romance language imperatives, but have a broader, typological question that could have bearing on the discussion.
Is anyone familiar with a language in the world that has no verb morphology (or very little), but has a morphologically distinct form for the imperative?
linguistlist.org>
E-mail this message to a friend
