* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
LINGUIST List logo Eastern Michigan University Wayne State University *
* People & Organizations * Jobs * Calls & Conferences * Publications * Language Resources * Text & Computer Tools * Teaching & Learning * Mailing Lists * Search *
* *
LINGUIST List 20.514

Wed Feb 18 2009

Qs: Atemporality in Language and Text

Editor for this issue: Dan Parker <danlinguistlist.org>

We'd like to remind readers that the responses to queries are usually best posted to the individual asking the question. That individual is then strongly encouraged to post a summary to the list. This policy was instituted to help control the huge volume of mail on LINGUIST; so we would appreciate your cooperating with it whenever it seems appropriate.

In addition to posting a summary, we'd like to remind people that it is usually a good idea to personally thank those individuals who have taken the trouble to respond to the query.

To post to LINGUIST, use our convenient web form at http://linguistlist.org/LL/posttolinguist.html.
        1.    Tania Notarius, Atemporality in Language and Text

Message 1: Atemporality in Language and Text
Date: 18-Feb-2009
From: Tania Notarius <tnotariusmscc.huji.ac.il>
Subject: Atemporality in Language and Text
E-mail this message to a friend

Atemporlaity is mentioned by many linguists, but I am not aware of a
monograph that will treat different sides of this phenomenon in language
and text. I am interested in research and publications on (1) the lack of
one of three types of temporal relation (anteriority, simultaneity,
posteriority) between ET and RT; (2) lack of an explicit ST reference in
context; (3) lack of an explicit RT in context in different languages and
discourse modes, including poetic language.

Linguistic Field(s): Semantics

Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issue

Please report any bad links or misclassified data

LINGUIST Homepage | Read LINGUIST | Contact us

NSF Logo

While the LINGUIST List makes every effort to ensure the linguistic relevance of sites listed
on its pages, it cannot vouch for their contents.