LINGUIST List 20.598
|
Thu Feb 26 2009
Qs: Past/perfect to Imminent Future
Editor for this issue: Dan Parker
<dan linguistlist.org>
|
We'd like to remind readers that the responses to queries are usually best posted to the individual asking the question. That individual is then strongly encouraged to post a summary to the list. This policy was
instituted to help control the huge volume of mail on LINGUIST; so we would appreciate your cooperating with it whenever it seems appropriate.
In addition to posting a summary, we'd like to remind people that it is usually a good idea to personally thank those individuals who have taken the trouble to respond to the query.
To post to LINGUIST, use our convenient web form at http://linguistlist.org/LL/posttolinguist.html.
|
Directory
1. Eleanor
Coghill,
Past/perfect to Imminent Future
Message 1: Past/perfect to Imminent Future
|
Date: 25-Feb-2009
From: Eleanor Coghill <ejc22 cam.ac.uk>
Subject: Past/perfect to Imminent Future
E-mail this message to a friend
In a dialect of Neo-Aramaic (the dialect of Telkepe) there is a verb form expressing the imminent future which derives from a perfect/past tense. This form is only available for the verb ‘to go’: zil-ən l-šūqɒ. go.IMM.FUT-I to-market ‘I’m going to the market’, ‘I’m just off to the market’ (said before departure) Note that this form is also used as an auxiliary verb for prospective aspect: zil-ən ʾaxlən. PROSP-I eat:I ‘I’m going to eat.’ Judging from historical and comparative dialectal evidence, zil-ən originally meant ‘I have gone/I went’. This form was used for intransitive verbs, but was lost when the paradigm for transitive verbs spread to intransitive verbs. This verb is now all that remains of the old intransitive paradigm. In some languages it is possible to use a past tense or perfect to express the imminent future, e.g. Russian ja pošel ‘I left’, said when one is about to leave. The difference here is that the past meaning is no longer available. Do readers know of any other cases like this, where a perfect or past tense has taken on imminent future meaning then lost the past function altogether? Also are there parallels to the restriction to the verb ‘to go’? I’ll post a summary of any responses. Thanks, Eleanor Coghill University of Cambridge
Linguistic Field(s):
Historical Linguistics
Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issue
|
|

Please report any bad links or misclassified data
LINGUIST Homepage | Read
LINGUIST | Contact us

While the LINGUIST List makes every effort to ensure the linguistic relevance of sites listed on its pages, it cannot vouch for their contents.
|
|