* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
LINGUIST List logo Eastern Michigan University Wayne State University *
* People & Organizations * Jobs * Calls & Conferences * Publications * Language Resources * Text & Computer Tools * Teaching & Learning * Mailing Lists * Search *
* *
LINGUIST List 20.755

Mon Mar 09 2009

Calls: Semantics/Germany

Editor for this issue: Kate Wu <katelinguistlist.org>


LINGUIST is pleased to announce the launch of an exciting new feature: Easy Abstracts! Easy Abs is a free abstract submission and review facility designed to help conference organizers and reviewers accept and process abstracts online. Just go to: http://www.linguistlist.org/confcustom, and begin your conference customization process today! With Easy Abstracts, submission and review will be as easy as 1-2-3!
Directory
        1.    Ilaria Frana, Frequently Asked Concealed Questions


Message 1: Frequently Asked Concealed Questions
Date: 09-Mar-2009
From: Ilaria Frana <Ilaria.Franaphil.uni-goettingen.de>
Subject: Frequently Asked Concealed Questions
E-mail this message to a friend

Full Title: Frequently Asked Concealed Questions
Short Title: FACQs

Date: 05-Jun-2009 - 07-Jun-2009
Location: Goettingen, Germany
Contact Person: Ilaria Frana
Meeting Email: facquni-goettingen.de
Web Site: http://zis.uni-goettingen.de/events/facqs/

Linguistic Field(s): Semantics

Call Deadline: 05-Apr-2009

Meeting Description:

Frequently Asked Concealed Questions

Call for Papers

The aim of the meeting is to provide a forum for the presentation and discussion
of original work on concealed questions. We welcome the submission of papers on
different languages clearly articulating empirical and formal issues, including
but not limited to the following:
- Do we have strong evidence to decide on the semantic type of a DP-CQ?
(Should it be a property? an individual concept? a question? a proposition?)
- What is the best way to characterize the class of predicates that take DP-CQ
complements?
- Why do only certain nouns make good DP-CQs? Which theory on the market is best
suited to account for this fact?
- Why do certain kinds of nominal modifiers (relative clauses, superlatives)
help in recovering CQ-readings?
- What is the role of de re belief ascriptions in the derivation of CQ-readings?
- What do DP-CQs share with other DPs in intensional positions (eg, the object
DP in 'John seeks a unicorn' or the subject DP in'The temperature is rising')?
- Do we want a unified account of concealed questions and concealed exclamatives
(eg.'It's amazing the price you had to pay for that')?

Abstract Submissions
Abstracts are invited for 30-minute talks (20 minute presentations plus 10
minutes for discussion). Abstracts should be anonymous and confined to two pages
(including examples and references) with 1-inch margins and 12-point font. One
single authored and a co-authored abstract can be submitted All abstracts must
be submitted via the Easychair platform available from the web site.

Important Dates
Submission Deadline: April 5
Notification: April 30
Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issue




Please report any bad links or misclassified data

LINGUIST Homepage | Read LINGUIST | Contact us

NSF Logo

While the LINGUIST List makes every effort to ensure the linguistic relevance of sites listed
on its pages, it cannot vouch for their contents.