* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
LINGUIST List logo Eastern Michigan University Wayne State University *
* People & Organizations * Jobs * Calls & Conferences * Publications * Language Resources * Text & Computer Tools * Teaching & Learning * Mailing Lists * Search *
* *
LINGUIST List 21.1076

Fri Mar 05 2010

Review: Syntax: Radford (2009)

Editor for this issue: Monica Macaulay <monicalinguistlist.org>


This LINGUIST List issue is a review of a book published by one of our supporting publishers, commissioned by our book review editorial staff. We welcome discussion of this book review on the list, and particularly invite the author(s) or editor(s) of this book to join in. If you are interested in reviewing a book for LINGUIST, look for the most recent posting with the subject "Reviews: AVAILABLE FOR REVIEW", and follow the instructions at the top of the message. You can also contact the book review staff directly.
Directory
        1.    Julie Winter, An Introduction to English Sentence Structure

Message 1: An Introduction to English Sentence Structure
Date: 05-Mar-2010
From: Julie Winter <jmwinter76yahoo.com>
Subject: An Introduction to English Sentence Structure
E-mail this message to a friend

Discuss this message

Announced at http://linguistlist.org/issues/20/20-915.html
AUTHOR: Radford, Andrew
TITLE: An Introduction to English Sentence Structure
PUBLISHER: Cambridge University Press
YEAR: 2009

Julie M. Winter, Department of English, University of Munich

INTRODUCTION

This textbook presents students with an introduction to English syntax, as it is
conceived in Chomsky's Minimalist Program and in light of recent research in
syntactic theory. Radford states that the book is intended for students with
little background in syntax, for those who have completed some work in syntax
but who want to learn more about Minimalism, and for students in the field whose
first language is not English. The author is concerned that the text be clear
and approachable and emphasizes that he intends to avoid ''unnecessary complexity
and unexplained jargon'' (viii).

There are nine chapters, each of which builds in complexity upon the former
chapter. Each chapter has a similar structure: the main points of the text are
presented and explained and are later summarized at the end. Key concepts are
listed, there is a prose-style bibliography intended for students interested in
further reading and research, there are exercises with sample explanations for
some of the problems and model answers and hints for others. The book contains a
glossary of terms and an index, and teaching materials are available on an
accompanying website, as well as additional help with select exercises.

This particular textbook is a shorter version of Radford's ''Analysing English
Sentences: A Minimalist Approach.'' According to the author, both books are
organized in a similar manner, but the one under review here is less detailed
and more easily accessible to the beginner in syntax. This review will not
compare the two versions and will deal with Radford's shorter text exclusively.

SUMMARY

Chapter 1 - Grammar: Radford defines the concept of syntax and outlines the
taxonomy of terms used in traditional grammar to describe sentence structures.
He then turns to Chomsky's cognitive view of language and his theory of
Universal Grammar. He presents Chomsky's notion of a Language Faculty which
accounts for the innate human ability to acquire language, and he explains how
principles of Universal Grammar underlie this model. He discusses the concept of
parameters, describes their binary nature and their role in language acquisition.

Chapter 2 - Structure: This chapter focuses on the way words are put together to
build sentences. Radford discusses the idea that a series of binary merger
operations are carried out in this process, and he introduces the use of tree
diagrams. He furthermore presents the Minimalist view that function words, such
as determiners, can serve as heads for phrases and explains key concepts used
throughout the book, such as Tense Projection or Tense Phrase (TP),
Complementiser Projection or Complementiser Phrase (CP), and ''c-command.''

Chapter 3 - Null constituents: The concept of ''constituents which have
grammatical and semantic features but lack audible phonetic features (and so are
'silent' or 'inaudible')'' (81) is the topic of this chapter. While these
constituents are not audible, the syntax of the phrase in question is a product
of the operation of such features. For example, in a simple sentence such as ''He
enjoys syntax'' (89) there is a null auxiliary or abstract tense feature which is
lowered from the head of the TP onto the main verb, a phenomenon known as affix
hopping. Radford presents the notion that all phrases are headed by overt
complementisers such as ''that'' or ''if,'' or null complementisers which indicate
the force of the structure, i.e. whether it is declarative, interrogative,
imperative or exclamative in nature.

Chapter 4 - Head movement: So far, Radford has introduced necessary concepts to
understand merger operations in the framework of Minimalist syntax; now he
presents and demonstrates various movement operations that account for such
structures as inverted auxiliaries in questions. Ultimately, head movement
operations involve copying and deletion operations. The notion that
complementisers are strong in nature and thus attract auxiliary movement is also
explained.

Chapter 5 - Wh-movement: This chapter looks at how question words ('who',
'what', 'why', etc.) become specifiers (the position preceding the head of
Complementiser Phrases). In this context, a question such as ''What languages can
you speak?'' has a paraphrase structure of ''You can speak what languages?''
(152-153). The wh-movement we see here is revealed to be a copying and deletion
movement which leaves behind a null copy of itself, also known as a ''trace.''

Chapter 6 - A-movement: ''A'' refers to arguments, which are subjects and
complements of verbs, and this chapter first defines the various semantic roles
of arguments and then explains the movement operations which allow them to
become subjects, or specifiers, within the TP. The ''VP (Verb Phrase)-Internal
Subject Hypothesis'' is discussed as the basis of this operation: It is the
hypothesis that ''subjects originate internally within VP'' (199). Further
introduced and discussed are the concepts of controlling and raising predicates.

Chapter 7 - Agreement, case and A-movement: Radford explores the syntax of
agreement in this chapter, and presents Chomsky's concepts of ''probe'' and ''goal''
in order to explain how agreement and case-marking occur. The sample passive
structure ''There were awarded several prizes'' (237) demonstrates how agreement
comes about. In traditional grammar it would appear that the subject and verb do
not agree. We learn that the verb BE is a probe that searches for a goal to
achieve agreement in person, case and number. This chapter also discusses the
expletives ''it'' and ''there'' and how agreement and case come about in structures
containing these items.

Chapter 8 - Split projections: In this chapter Radford explains how CP, TP and
VP structures can be viewed as different types of projections; hence, they
should be ''split'' into various categories. A CP can be split into a Force
Phrase, Topic Phrase and Focus Phrase projection; TP can be split into Tense,
Aspect and Mood projections, and VP can be split into ''an inner VP core headed
by a lexical verb and an outer vP shell headed by an affixal light verb'' (314).

Chapter 9 - Phases: This chapter focuses on Chomsky's theory that syntactic
structures are formed by a series of phases that are ultimately expressed in a
semantic and phonological form by means of a transfer movement. Radford writes
that such a phase theory would explain how humans are able to process large
amounts of material and data using limited memory capacity.

EVALUATION

Syntax is a highly abstract and theoretical area for the beginner student, and a
great number of technical terms must be mastered in order to comprehend the
material. The author presents the subject in a simple and straightforward
manner, avoiding jargon that has not been explained in the process. He carefully
defines terms as soon as they are introduced, and his definitions are generally
illuminating and accessible. The terms appear in bold print, which makes it easy
for readers to go back to check definitions as they progress through the text.

A particularly strong feature of the textbook is the way in which Radford
introduces new and potentially difficult concepts with a sample sentence and a
tree diagram, as well as a written explanation of the merger and movement
operations that take place. Such explanations occur several times in each
chapter throughout the book, and they have a calming effect that reminds
students that these operations are logical in construction and they all function
in similar ways, and, importantly, that the material can be mastered. In a
similar fashion, Radford frequently recaps information already presented, in
formal summaries at the ends of the chapters, but also informally as he begins
each new chapter. Again, this has the effect of reminding readers that the
material is familiar and accessible. One has the impression upon reading this
text that a teacher with a great deal of knowledge and experience has written it.

The bibliography at the end of each chapter is yet another important strength of
the book. The discussion-style format is quite accessible, and the suggested
readings not only support the topics at hand but also offer various viewpoints
concerning the syntactic structures in question. Given the theoretical nature of
the subject, it is valuable to stress to beginning students that there are
diverse viewpoints on syntactic nuances.

While Radford generally explains and defines syntactic concepts in a careful
manner, there are some omissions. For example, the following terms have been
used without explanation in the main text (although the definitions are in the
glossary in the back): ''string,'' ''force,'' ''case.'' In my experience, even
students who have been exposed to basic syntax will need to have such terms
defined at the outset. Such omissions go against the idea that this text is
intended for students with minimal experience and ''with only minimal grammatical
knowledge'' (viii).

These omissions point to a potential problem with the textbook: It is hard to
understand how the intended audience could be students with little background in
grammar and syntax, and students whose first language is not English, as
outlined in the author's preface. Given the difficult nature of the topic, the
author tends to downplay the level of experience that is required in order to
grasp the material. In fact, the book would be most suitable for students who
already have a very good foundation in English sentence structure and
traditional grammar.

However, with the guidance of a knowledgeable instructor, this text would be an
excellent choice for a course with Minimalist syntax as its content. It is a
solid, well-written, thorough treatment of the subject, and it would certainly
help students grasp some of the underlying complexity of this area of study.

ABOUT THE REVIEWER

Dr. Winter is a lecturer in the English Department at the University of Munich in Germany. Her research interests are in the areas of syntax, pragmatics, history of English, stylistics and translation.


This Year the LINGUIST List hopes to raise $65,000. This money will go to help 
keep the List running by supporting all of our Student Editors for the coming year.

See below for donation instructions, and don't forget to check out our Space Fund 
Drive 2010 and join us for a great journey!

http://linguistlist.org/fund-drive/2010/

There are many ways to donate to LINGUIST!

You can donate right now using our secure credit card form at  
https://linguistlist.org/donation/donate/donate1.cfm

Alternatively you can also pledge right now and pay later. To do so, go to: 
https://linguistlist.org/donation/pledge/pledge1.cfm

For all information on donating and pledging, including information on how to 
donate by check, money order, or wire transfer, please visit: 
http://linguistlist.org/donation/

The LINGUIST List is under the umbrella of Eastern Michigan University and as 
such can receive donations through the EMU Foundation, which is a registered 
501(c) Non Profit organization. Our Federal Tax number is 38-6005986. These 
donations can be offset against your federal and sometimes your state tax return 
(U.S. tax payers only). For more information visit the IRS Web-Site, or contact 
your financial advisor.

Many companies also offer a gift matching program, such that they will match 
any gift you make to a non-profit organization. Normally this entails your 
contacting your human resources department and sending us a form that the 
EMU Foundation fills in and returns to your employer. This is generally a simple 
administrative procedure that doubles the value of your gift to LINGUIST, without 
costing you an extra penny. Please take a moment to check if your company 
operates such a program.

Thank you very much for your support of LINGUIST!


Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issue




Please report any bad links or misclassified data

LINGUIST Homepage | Read LINGUIST | Contact us

NSF Logo

While the LINGUIST List makes every effort to ensure the linguistic relevance of sites listed
on its pages, it cannot vouch for their contents.