* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
LINGUIST List logo Eastern Michigan University Wayne State University *
* People & Organizations * Jobs * Calls & Conferences * Publications * Language Resources * Text & Computer Tools * Teaching & Learning * Mailing Lists * Search *
* *
LINGUIST List 21.1093

Sat Mar 06 2010

Diss: Semantics: Port: 'Omitted Arguments and Complexity of...'

Editor for this issue: Di Wdzenczny <dilinguistlist.org>

To post to LINGUIST, use our convenient web form at http://linguistlist.org/LL/posttolinguist.cfm.
        1.    Martin Port, Omitted Arguments and Complexity of Predication

Message 1: Omitted Arguments and Complexity of Predication
Date: 02-Mar-2010
From: Martin Port <mport2500aol.com>
Subject: Omitted Arguments and Complexity of Predication
E-mail this message to a friend

Institution: City University of New York
Program: Linguistics
Dissertation Status: Completed
Degree Date: 2010

Author: Martin A. Port

Dissertation Title: Omitted Arguments and Complexity of Predication

Linguistic Field(s): Semantics

Subject Language(s): English (eng)

Dissertation Director:
William McClure

Dissertation Abstract:

This work focuses on the licensing conditions and logical structure of
understood-argument constructions, or complement-drop
constructions, in English. There are two main types of such arguments:
Indefinite Understood Arguments (IUA) and Definite Understood
Arguments (DUA). IUA readings occur in such cases in He ate, He
cooked. In such cases, the reference of the dropped element need not
be known for the sentence to be satisfactorily interpretable. DUA
readings are given in such examples as She followed, She won. Here
the reference of the missing element must be known to the
speaker/hearer; it must appear in discourse.

Our central claim is that it is not necessary to resort to explanatory
factors outside the lexical-semantic structure of verbs in order to
account for the alternations. We propose that for both IUA and DUA,
the structure of the understood argument is a complex structure
involving existential quantification: '∃x [P(x)]'. It is never a simplex,
atomic element that could be represented by an individual constant.
For IUA cases, we justify this complex structure by showing that it is
mirrored in the structure of the alternating verbs. We note in particular
that IUA verbs often undergo other alternations such as the
material/product alternation, which we consider to be an indication of a
complex lexical structure.

For Definite Understood Arguments, we give two licensing factors that
correspond to the variable and the predicate in the logical form. We
motivate existential quantification in DUA constructions, by considering
such contrasts as I know/I know about that vs. I believe/*I believe about
that. Selecting for a PP-complement correlates with the possibility of
DUA. We claim that in this example, the about-phrase provides a slot
for a variable, since the phrase makes allusion to some object without
stating explicitly what it is.

We conclude by analyzing subject-drop alternations--the causative-
inchoative alternation--in the light of our findings regarding complement
drop. We note that this alternation occurs with verbs of a simplex
structure; and we offer a description of the general system of argument
drop in English.

This Year the LINGUIST List hopes to raise $65,000. This money will go to help 
keep the List running by supporting all of our Student Editors for the coming year.

See below for donation instructions, and don't forget to check out our Space Fund 
Drive 2010 and join us for a great journey!


There are many ways to donate to LINGUIST!

You can donate right now using our secure credit card form at  

Alternatively you can also pledge right now and pay later. To do so, go to: 

For all information on donating and pledging, including information on how to 
donate by check, money order, or wire transfer, please visit: 

The LINGUIST List is under the umbrella of Eastern Michigan University and as 
such can receive donations through the EMU Foundation, which is a registered 
501(c) Non Profit organization. Our Federal Tax number is 38-6005986. These 
donations can be offset against your federal and sometimes your state tax return 
(U.S. tax payers only). For more information visit the IRS Web-Site, or contact 
your financial advisor.

Many companies also offer a gift matching program, such that they will match 
any gift you make to a non-profit organization. Normally this entails your 
contacting your human resources department and sending us a form that the 
EMU Foundation fills in and returns to your employer. This is generally a simple 
administrative procedure that doubles the value of your gift to LINGUIST, without 
costing you an extra penny. Please take a moment to check if your company 
operates such a program.

Thank you very much for your support of LINGUIST!

Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issue

Please report any bad links or misclassified data

LINGUIST Homepage | Read LINGUIST | Contact us

NSF Logo

While the LINGUIST List makes every effort to ensure the linguistic relevance of sites listed
on its pages, it cannot vouch for their contents.