LINGUIST List 21.1736
|
Fri Apr 09 2010
Confs: Slavic, Syntax/USA
Editor for this issue: Amy Brunett
<brunett linguistlist.org>
|
LINGUIST is pleased to announce the launch of an exciting new feature: Easy Abstracts! Easy Abs is a free abstract submission and review facility designed to help conference organizers and reviewers accept and process abstracts online. Just go to: http://www.linguistlist.org/confcustom, and begin your conference customization process today! With Easy Abstracts, submission and review will be as easy as 1-2-3!
|
Directory
1. Ewan
Dunbar,
A Slavic Perspective on Islands
Message 1: A Slavic Perspective on Islands
|
Date: 09-Apr-2010
From: Ewan Dunbar <emd umd.edu>
Subject: A Slavic Perspective on Islands
E-mail this message to a friend
A Slavic Perspective on Islands Date: 25-Apr-2010 - 25-Apr-2010 Location: College Park, MD, USA Contact: Chris LaTerza Contact Email: faslnineteen gmail.com Linguistic Field(s): Syntax Language Family(ies): Slavic Subgroup Meeting Description: This year, as part of the Formal Approaches to Slavic Linguistics (FASL) conference, we are hosting a special session that focuses on how the study of formal Slavic linguistics bears on current theories of syntactic islands. Invited Speaker: Hana Filip (University of Florida) Sunday, April 25 Special Session on Islands: 9:30-10:10 Roumyana Pancheva and Barbara Tomaszewicz (University of Southern California): Variability in vP-Subject Island Violations 10:10-10:50 T. Wood Grinsell (University of Chicago): Lithuanian Modal Comparatives: Implications for the Syntax and Semantics of Comparison in Slavic 10:50-11:30 Anne Sturgeon, Ekaterina Kravtchenko, Maria Polinksy, and Carlos Gomez Gallo (Harvard University): Subject Islands in Slavic: The Syntactic Position Matters!
Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issue
|
|

Please report any bad links or misclassified data
LINGUIST Homepage | Read
LINGUIST | Contact us

While the LINGUIST List makes every effort to ensure the linguistic relevance of sites listed on its pages, it cannot vouch for their contents.
|
|