LINGUIST List 21.1803|
Wed Apr 14 2010
Review: Morphology; Phonology; Syntax: Olawsky (2008)
Editor for this issue: Monica Macaulay
This LINGUIST List issue is a review of a book published by one of our supporting publishers, commissioned by our book review editorial staff. We welcome discussion of this book review on the list, and particularly invite the author(s) or editor(s) of this book to join in. If you are interested in reviewing a book for LINGUIST, look for the most recent posting with the subject "Reviews: AVAILABLE FOR REVIEW", and follow the instructions at the top of the message. You can also contact the book review staff directly.
Aspects of Dagbani Grammar
Message 1: Aspects of Dagbani Grammar
From: David Erschler <erschlergmail.com>
Subject: Aspects of Dagbani Grammar
E-mail this message to a friend
Discuss this message
Announced at http://linguistlist.org/issues/19/19-2991.html
AUTHOR: Olawsky, Knut J.
TITLE: Aspects of Dagbani Grammar
SUBTITLE: With special emphasis on phonology and morphology
SERIES TITLE: LINCOM Studies in African Linguistics 41
PUBLISHER: Lincom GmbH
YEAR: 2008 (1999)
David Erschler, Independent University of Moscow, Russia
The book under review is a re-edition of Olawsky's 1998 Düsseldorf doctoral
thesis. The book is very far from being a reference grammar, but despite 10
years since its first publication it still remains the principal source of
reference on Dagbani, a Northern Gur language of Northern Ghana. Since then,
only a few works on Dagbani have appeared (Olawsky 2002; Hyman & Olawsky 2003;
Olawsky 2004; Hudu 2005; Purvis 2007; Purvis 2008).
The book is addressed primarily to Gur scholars. As the presentation is often
rather sketchy, a typologist in need of Gur data to include in her or his sample
would probably have to look for a more comprehensive grammar.
After a short introduction there follows chapter 2, Lexicon and Syntax. This
chapter lists the principal grammatical categories of the language (nouns,
verbs, adjectives, adpositions, various types of pronouns). The somewhat
mysterious distinction of ''true'' and ''false'' adjectives is cleared up in Olawsky
(2004). A separate section of the chapter deals with verb functions (tense,
aspect, and modality). Further, main features of Dagbani syntax are described:
it is mostly head-initial (SVO, nouns precede adjectives, however, there exist
both prepositions and postpositions). Two phenomena strike me as unusual
(probably they are less surprising for experts on Gur): first, special markers
(depending on the TAM characteristics of the verb) show up when the verb is
clause final (p. 31, the gloss FIN is mine):
o nyu_ri_ kom
he drink.IPF water
'He drinks water.'
'He drinks.' (intended)
It should be noted, however, that verbs in all examples illustrating this
phenomenon are either transitive or unergative; it is unclear what happens to
The second surprising phenomenon is that interchanging the subject and the
object of a sentence sometimes produces a passive reading (and does not always
interchange the roles of the agent and the patient, as it might be expected)
(2) inversion producing the ''normal'' semantic effect, p. 65:
paga maa nya adam
woman DEF see Adam
'The woman saw Adam.'
adam nya paga maa
Adam see woman DEF
'The woman saw Adam.'
(3) inversion producing the passive reading, p. 65:
bugim di bua
fire burn goat
'Fire burnt a goat.'
bua di bugim
goat burn fire
'A goat was burnt by fire.'
The factors governing the choice of one of the readings are not discussed, but
Olawsky conjectures that such 'passive inversion' is allowed only when the
distribution of thematic roles can be unambiguously derived from the context.
Chapter 3, Morphology: In the first section of this chapter main grammatical
categories of the language are listed again. In Section 2, the author describes
the inflectional morphology. He deals first and foremost with nouns, refining
the extant definition of Dagbani noun classes (Wilson 1972). Dagbani has a
number of semantically non-transparent noun classes, characterized with
particular singular and plural suffixes: pag-a woman-SG / pag-ba woman-PL, class
2a in Olawsky's numbering (p. 84), gab-ga rope-SG 'rope', gab-si rope-PL
'ropes', class 3a (p. 85), etc.
The subsection on the verbal morphology begins with a description of aspect
markers. Then the imperative form is discussed (it is not mentioned at all in
the section on verbal functions in ch. 2, and the prohibitive marker is absent
from the subsection on negation in ch. 2, p. 49).
Section 3 describes the derivational morphology. Listed are suffixes used for
noun derivation. For verbs, only the causative suffix is mentioned. It remains
unclear from the text whether verbs form an open class and if so, how new verbs
can be formed.
Section 4 lists possible types of compounding in Dagbani. This information is
used later in the section on tone in chapter 4. All compounds listed here are
Section 5 discusses reduplication. Olawsky shows that reduplication is not a
productive phenomenon in Dagbani.
Section 6 deals with numerals. The last section of this chapter describes an
experiment on mental representation of noun classes using nonce-words.
A long chapter 4 is subdivided into 2 parts. The first part, Prosodic Structure,
treats syllable types, stress, and tone (mostly in isolated nouns and noun
Olawsky shows that Dagbani usually has penultimate stress. The few exceptions
with the stress on the ultimate syllable are analyzed via catalexis (i.e.
positing a fictitious additional final syllable), p. 177. Later it is shown that
such nouns demonstrate certain irregularities with respect to their tone pattern
as well, and this effect is also explained using catalexis, p. 190.
The language possesses a two-tone system. A pre-OT autosegmental analysis of it
is presented on pp. 195-229. This analysis is extended to verbs in Hyman &
The second part, Segmental Phonology, discusses the phoneme inventory of the
language. It touches on some subtle issues of phonemic status of certain sounds
and describes the ATR harmony in Dagbani. The conclusion is ''that the solely
phonetic status of vowel harmony must be emphasized, whereas this phenomenon
seems to play a more dominant role in other Gur languages'', p. 249.
The book ends with the bibliography (pp. 272-283; books specifically on Dagbani;
other linguistic literature, and books in Dagbani are listed separately), a map
of Ghana (p. 284), the complete list of noun classes (pp. 285-286), a list of
reduplications (p. 287), a list of contributors (p. 288), Abbreviations (pp.
289-290), and a subject index (pp. 291-293).
The book contains a lot of extremely interesting data but a number of
unfortunate decisions make it less informative and harder to read than it could
The first of them is the tendency of the author to use the orthography without
doubling it with the morphonological transcription: as Olawsky shows (see, for
instance, p. 13), the orthography is rather inexact, and potentially important
information is thus probably lost to non-experts on Dagbani. The decision is
motivated by Dagbani's being a written language: ''literacy has been making
progress recently and has to be promoted by all means'' (p. 6). I am inclined to
doubt that choosing the imprecise orthography over the morphonological or
phonetic representation in a book whose primary audience are linguists is a
particularly efficient way of promoting literacy among Dagbani speakers.
Orthographical examples are put in angular brackets, phonological/morphological
representation in slashes, and IPA phonetic transcription in square brackets. It
took me some time to memorize which type of bracket stands for which. The
phonetic transcription is apparently often inexact, as it tends to disregard the
Another decision that seems to me unfortunate is to avoid marking tone in all
sections of the book except the one specifically dealing with tone.
The reading of the book is not facilitated by very small print and the somewhat
Turning to more substantial issues, the book seems to suffer from a number of
omissions and occasional unclear arguments. I will mention here only some of
these points, for the purpose of illustration.
Syntax of adverbs is not treated separately anywhere, and it is only from
examples that a reader may deduce that they probably follow the verb. Without a
special discussion it is unclear why ''time depth markers'' (p. 34: 'earlier same
day', 'one day away', etc.) are not a subclass of adverbs but a closed category
on its own. In the section on focusing (3.3.7., p. 64) only examples of time and
place adverbials are given. It is unclear whether others types of adverbs can be
fronted as well, what is the ordering of adverbs, etc.
An argument that struck me as odd is that the ''about to'' particle _yen_ is
denied the status of tense marker on the reason of its ability to co-occur with
a time-depth marker (p. 33). However, examples (52 c,f) on p. 35 show that the
future marker _ni_ can also co-occur with them.
On p. 19, it is stated that ''Adpositions can be either prepositions or
postpositions, the latter type of which occurs directly after the noun.''
However, examples on pp. 17-18 show that 'true' adjectives also placed
immediately postnominally. I wonder whether it means that ''directly after the
noun'' should actually read ''directly after the noun phrase'' or that adjectives
and postpositions are in complementary distribution.
p. 48: ''Whereas raising sentences admit a 'dummy' subject (, cf. (23), a
table of pronouns), control verbs require a 'normal' NP, i.e. the subject as the
controller is a pronoun or a noun (NP). Raising verbs in this sense are not
attested in Dagbani (…).'' As no examples of ''raising verbs'' are given to
clarify the point the statement remains rather confusing.
The work (Vogel 1997) quoted on p. 27 is absent from the bibliography.
All of that probably does not create any difficulties for Gur scholars but make
the book not an easy read for the non-initiated. However, the book presents more
than enough data to whet a typologist's appetite. It remains to hope that
someday a full scale reference grammar of this fascinating language will be
written and published.
Hudu, Fusheini. 2005. Number marking in Dagbani. MA thesis. University of Alberta.
L.M. Hyman & Knut Olawsky. 2003. ''Dagbani verb tonology''. In Chege Githiora,
Heather Littlefield & Victor Manfredi (eds.), Trends in African Linguistics 4,
97-108. Trenton, N.J.: Africa World Press, Inc.
Olawsky, Knut J. 2002. What is a word in Dagbani? In: Word. A cross-linguistic
typology, edited by R. M. W. Dixon and Alexandra Y. Aikhenvald. Cambridge:
Cambridge University Press, 205-226.
Olawsky, Knut. 2004. What is a noun? What is an adjective?. Problems of
classification in Dagbani. JALL 25 (2004), 127-148
Purvis, Tristan Michael. 2007. A Reanalysis of Nonemphatic Pronouns in Dagbani.
In and Stephen Wechsler (eds) The Proceedings of the Texas Linguistic Society IX
Conference: The Morphosyntax of Underrepresented Languages. pp. 239-264. CSLI
Publications. Stanford, CA.
Purvis, Tristan Michael. 2008. A linguistic and discursive analysis of register
variation in Dagbani. Ph.D. thesis, Indiana University.
Wilson, W.A.A. 1972. An introductory course to Dagbani. Tamale: GILLBT.
FIN marker of the clause-final position of a verb
IPF imperfective aspect
NP noun phrase
OT optimality theory
ABOUT THE REVIEWER
David Erschler holds a PhD in Mathematics from Tel Aviv University, Israel. He is a lecturer at the Independent University of Moscow, Russia. His main interests include Ossetic syntax, areal influences on Ossetic grammar, Uralic languages, and syntactic typology.
Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issue
Please report any bad links or misclassified data
LINGUIST Homepage | Read
LINGUIST | Contact us
While the LINGUIST List makes every effort to ensure the linguistic relevance of sites listed
on its pages, it cannot vouch for their contents.