* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
LINGUIST List logo Eastern Michigan University Wayne State University *
* People & Organizations * Jobs * Calls & Conferences * Publications * Language Resources * Text & Computer Tools * Teaching & Learning * Mailing Lists * Search *
* *
LINGUIST List 21.1858

Sat Apr 17 2010

Qs: Reduplication as a Valency-Adjusting Strategy

Editor for this issue: Danielle St. Jean <daniellelinguistlist.org>


We'd like to remind readers that the responses to queries are usually best posted to the individual asking the question. That individual is then strongly encouraged to post a summary to the list. This policy was instituted to help control the huge volume of mail on LINGUIST; so we would appreciate your cooperating with it whenever it seems appropriate.

In addition to posting a summary, we'd like to remind people that it is usually a good idea to personally thank those individuals who have taken the trouble to respond to the query.

To post to LINGUIST, use our convenient web form at http://linguistlist.org/LL/posttolinguist.cfm.
Directory
        1.    Clement Appah, Reduplication as a Valency-Adjusting Strategy

Message 1: Reduplication as a Valency-Adjusting Strategy
Date: 15-Apr-2010
From: Clement Appah <c.appahlancaster.ac.uk>
Subject: Reduplication as a Valency-Adjusting Strategy
E-mail this message to a friend

Dear LINGUIST List members,

In the formation of Action Nominals (ANs) in Akan, intransitive verbs are
nominalized through the prefixation of [a-] (or its +ATR variant [e-] for
Fante), as in (1), while transitive verbs incorporate (are compounded
with) their internal arguments. This is the incorporating (INC) type of
ANs (Koptjevskaja-Tamm, 1993), as in (2).

(1) a. dzidzi -> e-dzidzi
'eat (intr.)' '(act of) eating'
b. saw -> a-saw
'dance' 'dancing'

(2) a. dzi edziban -> edzibandzi
'eat (tr.)food' 'eating'
b. tow ndwom -> ndwomtow
'sing song' 'singing'

In a handful of cases, instead of the incorporation of the internal
argument, the verb is (re)-reduplicated to form the nominal. Here, the
(re)-reduplicated forms undergo affixation just like intransitive verbs.

(3)
Input Derived AN
a. ka asεm -> asεmka
'say matter' 'settling issues'
b. keka nsεm -> nsεmkeka
c. keka keka nsεm -> *nsεmkekakeka
d. keka keka nsεm -> a-kekakeka

I suspect that this reduplication process is the remains of a defunct
valency altering (de-transitivizing) strategy in Akan where intransitive
forms of verbs were formed from transitive ones by reduplicating the
later and that the distinction between the two forms of the verb EAT –
dzi 'eat (transitive)' and dzidzi 'eat (intransitive)' are the fossilized
remains of this defunct process.

Other reduplicated intransitive verbs became lexicalized, as in (4) cf.
Balmer and Grant (1929).

(4) kã -> kekã
'to touch' 'to grope'
tow -> totow
'to throw' 'to fish'

I would be pleased to receive information on languages with an active
process (or even the fossilized remains of such a process) of deriving
intransitive verbs from transitive ones through reduplication.

I am aware of Bill Palmer's (1999) PhD Dissertation which deals briefly
with the subject in Kokota.

Please send any responses directly to me: c.appahlancaster.ac.uk.

Thank you in advance of your assistance,

Clement Appah
PhD Student, Lancaster University

References:

Balmer, William T., and F.C.F. Grant. 1929. A Grammar of the Fante-
Akan Language. London: Atlantic Press.

Koptjevskaja-Tamm M. 1993. Nominalizations. London/New York:
Routledge

Linguistic Field(s): Morphology
                            Syntax
                            Typology

Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issue




Please report any bad links or misclassified data

LINGUIST Homepage | Read LINGUIST | Contact us

NSF Logo

While the LINGUIST List makes every effort to ensure the linguistic relevance of sites listed
on its pages, it cannot vouch for their contents.