* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
LINGUIST List logo Eastern Michigan University Wayne State University *
* People & Organizations * Jobs * Calls & Conferences * Publications * Language Resources * Text & Computer Tools * Teaching & Learning * Mailing Lists * Search *
* *
LINGUIST List 21.2015

Tue Apr 27 2010

TOC: Journal of Literary Semantics 39/1 (2010)

Editor for this issue: Susanne Vejdemo <susannelinguistlist.org>

Directory
        1.    Julia Ulrich, Journal of Literary Semantics Vol 39, No 1 (2010)

Message 1: Journal of Literary Semantics Vol 39, No 1 (2010)
Date: 26-Apr-2010
From: Julia Ulrich <julia.ulrichdegruyter.com>
Subject: Journal of Literary Semantics Vol 39, No 1 (2010)
E-mail this message to a friend

Publisher: De Gruyter Mouton
http://www.degruyter.com/mouton

Journal Title: Journal of Literary Semantics (JLS)
Volume Number: 39
Issue Number: 1
Issue Date: 2010


Main Text:

Journal of Literary Semantics
Volume: 39, Number: 1 (April 2010)

The above issue is now available online from De Gruyter Mouton at:
http://www.reference-global.com/toc/jlse/2010/39/1?ai=w6&ui=w6&af=H


Articles

Naturalizing the unnatural: A view from blending theory
Monika Fludernik

Peeling the onion: Outcomes to origins in retrograde narrative
Ken Ireland

Causal attribution and the analysis of literary characters: A. C. Bradley's
study of Iago and Othello
Enrique Cámara Arenas

Building the stages of drama: Towards a Text World Theory account of dramatic
play-texts
Tracy Cruickshank and Ernestine Lahey


Review Article

Fludernik's natural narratological model: A reconsideration and pedagogical
implications
Nilli Diengott


Linguistic Field(s): Ling & Literature
                            Semantics
                            Discourse Analysis

Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issue




Please report any bad links or misclassified data

LINGUIST Homepage | Read LINGUIST | Contact us

NSF Logo

While the LINGUIST List makes every effort to ensure the linguistic relevance of sites listed
on its pages, it cannot vouch for their contents.