LINGUIST List 21.2247 Mon May 17 2010 Sum: Gender, Sexuality, and Language on the Internet Editor for this issue: Danielle St. Jean <daniellelinguistlist.org> To post to LINGUIST, use our convenient web form at http://linguistlist.org/LL/posttolinguist.cfm. Directory         1.    James Davis, Gender, Sexuality, and Language on the Internet Message 1: Gender, Sexuality, and Language on the Internet Date: 12-May-2010 From: James Davis <james.davisaluggageexitinsits.net> Subject: Gender, Sexuality, and Language on the Internet E-mail this message to a friend Query for this summary posted in LINGUIST Issue: 21.2002 I would like to thank Theresa Heyd, Patty Davies, Brian W. King, Jamie Findlay, Sandra Beyermann, Jannis Androutsopoulos, and Rowena Viney for their responses to my earlier query requesting information about gender and sexuality and their relation to language, especially on the internet. The information I received helped me find several good resources I had missed about the topic, with respondents directing me towards work by Deborah Cameron, Don Kulick, Celia Kitzinger, Victoria Land, Marisol del-Teso Craviotto, Bridge Markland, and Susan Herring. The work by Herring, Cameron, and Kulick have been especially useful to my research. Here is a list of a few of the full references I have found: Cameron, D. and D. Kulick (eds.) (2006) The Language and Sexuality Reader. London: Routledge. Cameron, D. and D. Kulick (2005) "Identity Crisis?" Language and Communication 25: 107-25. Cameron, D. and D. Kulick (2003) Language and Sexuality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Kulick, D. (2000) "Gay and Lesbian Language." Annual Review of Anthropology 29: 243-285. I was also directed to one link (http://www.slis.indiana.edu/faculty/herring/pubs.html), which is extensive and very handy. Linguistic Field(s): Discourse Analysis                             Sociolinguistics Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issue Page Updated: 17-May-2010       About LINGUIST    |   Contact Us       While the LINGUIST List makes every effort to ensure the linguistic relevance of sites listed on its pages, it cannot vouch for their contents.