LINGUIST List 21.2598|
Tue Jun 15 2010
Calls: Semantics, Syntax/Canada
Editor for this issue: Di Wdzenczny
LINGUIST is pleased to announce the launch of an exciting new feature: Easy Abstracts! Easy Abs is a free abstract submission and review facility designed to help conference organizers and reviewers accept and process abstracts online. Just go to: http://www.linguistlist.org/confcustom, and begin your conference customization process today! With Easy Abstracts, submission and review will be as easy as 1-2-3!
1. María Cristina
Workshop: 'The end of argument structure?'
Message 1: Workshop: 'The end of argument structure?'
From: María Cristina Cuervo <mc.cuervoutoronto.ca>
Subject: Workshop: 'The end of argument structure?'
E-mail this message to a friend
Full Title: Workshop: 'The end of argument structure?'
Date: 01-Oct-2010 - 02-Oct-2010
Location: Toronto, Canada
Contact Person: María Cristina Cuervo
Meeting Email: mc.cuervoutoronto.ca
Linguistic Field(s): Semantics; Syntax
Call Deadline: 19-Jul-2010
This workshop, to be held on 1-2 October, 2010, will be an opportunity to
explore current issues and re-assess generally accepted premises on the
relationship between lexical meaning and the morphosyntax of sentences. A
central question in the study of language concerns the mechanisms by
which the participants in an event described by a sentence come to occupy
their positions in the structure and acquire their interpretation. A long-
standing approach is based on the assumption that it is the lexical meaning
of a verb (or root) that determines, albeit indirectly, the basic properties of
sentence structure at the level of verbal meaning, including asymmetric
relations, thematic roles, case, and agreement. An alternative approach
claims that the syntax itself greatly restricts possible verbal meanings on the
basis of the legitimate relations that can exist between syntactic heads,
complements, and specifiers.
If we think that all systematic aspects of verbal meanings (licensing of
external argument, number and type of 'obligatory' and extra arguments,
agentivity, causativity, aksionsart, etc.) are dependent on configurational
properties, what is left for lexical entries? Do generalizations such as the
UTAH and other prominence hierarchies need to be stated explicitly, or are
they derived from more general principles of syntactic operations (and
structures) and semantic compositionality? What is left unexplained by
In order to promote an open exchange of ideas, we have in mind a real
workshop format rather than a regular conference, around themes that will
be determined in consultation with the invited participants, based on their
contributions. A small number of papers will be selected from open
Mark Baker (Rutgers University)
Heidi Harley (University of Arizona)
Lisa Travis (McGill University)
Invited student participant:
Grant Armstrong (Georgetown University)
Call For Papers
Abstracts are invited for oral presentations that address some issue on
argument structure and collaborate by arguing for one or the other position,
or presenting and discussing challenges. Abstracts must be 1 page long
plus one page for examples and references (maximum), with 2.5cm/1 inch
margins and 12 point font size, written in English.
Abstracts must be submitted electronically as an anonymous PDF file, to
either of the contact addresses. The subject line of the message should
state: October Workshop. In the body of the message, please include the
title of the abstract, the name of the author(s), affiliation(s) and contact
Deadline for abstract submission: 19 July, 2010
Notification of acceptance: 16 August, 2010
María Cristina Cuervo
University of Toronto
Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issue
Page Updated: 15-Jun-2010
While the LINGUIST List makes every effort to ensure the linguistic relevance of sites listed
on its pages, it cannot vouch for their contents.