LINGUIST List 21.2939
|
Thu Jul 15 2010
Calls: Philosophy of Language/InKoj. Interlingvistikaj Kajeroj (Jrnl)
Editor for this issue: Jessica Gardner
<gardner linguistlist.org>
|
LINGUIST is pleased to announce the launch of an exciting new feature: Easy Abstracts! Easy Abs is a free abstract submission and review facility designed to help conference organizers and reviewers accept and process abstracts online. Just go to: http://www.linguistlist.org/confcustom, and begin your conference customization process today! With Easy Abstracts, submission and review will be as easy as 1-2-3!
|
Directory
1. Federico
Gobbo,
InKoj. Interlingvistikaj Kajeroj
Message 1: InKoj. Interlingvistikaj Kajeroj
|
Date: 15-Jul-2010
From: Federico Gobbo <federico.gobbo uninsubria.it>
Subject: InKoj. Interlingvistikaj Kajeroj
E-mail this message to a friend
Full Title: InKoj. Interlingvistikaj Kajeroj
Linguistic Field(s): Philosophy of Language
Call Deadline: 15-Oct-2010
I am happy to announce that a Call for Papers is open for our journal InKoj, published by the University of Milan, with the support of the Centre d'Etudes Linguistiques pour L'Europe (CELE). InKoj is an open access journal, which deals with interlinguistics in a broad sense. InKoj is bilingual: each paper should be written in a widespread language (Kultursprache) and Esperanto. If you need a translator into Esperanto, please mention it while submitting your proposal. Being a six-monthly, we try to focus each issue with one or two topics relating to interlinguistics. The first issue of 2011 should be focused about the intersections between interlinguistics and logic, in particular ontology and mereology. Please have a look to our current issue, Volume 1 no. 2, 2010, under the topic 'Language construction and policies / Lingvokonstruado kaj lingvopolitikoj' available at http://riviste.unimi.it/index.php/inkoj/index
Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issue
|
|
Page Updated: 15-Jul-2010
|
|
About LINGUIST
|
Contact Us
While the LINGUIST List makes every effort to ensure the linguistic relevance of sites listed
on its pages, it cannot vouch for their contents.
|
|