* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
LINGUIST List logo Eastern Michigan University Wayne State University *
* People & Organizations * Jobs * Calls & Conferences * Publications * Language Resources * Text & Computer Tools * Teaching & Learning * Mailing Lists * Search *
* *
LINGUIST List 21.3083

Tue Jul 27 2010

TOC: Journal of Language & Politics 9/2 (2010)

Editor for this issue: Dayn Schulert <daynlinguistlist.org>

Directory
        1.    Paul Peranteau, Journal of Language & Politics Vol. 9, No. 2 (2010)

Message 1: Journal of Language & Politics Vol. 9, No. 2 (2010)
Date: 26-Jul-2010
From: Paul Peranteau <paulbenjamins.com>
Subject: Journal of Language & Politics Vol. 9, No. 2 (2010)
E-mail this message to a friend

Publisher: John Benjamins
http://www.benjamins.com/

Journal Title: Journal of Language & Politics
Volume Number: 9
Issue Number: 2
Issue Date: 2010


Main Text:

Journal of Language and Politics 9:2

2010. ca. 160 pp.

Table of contents

Articles
Dissonant political discourse
Mira Moshe 175–194

The female political leader: A study of gender-identity in the case of Margaret
Thatcher
Douglas M. Ponton 195–218

The fragility of visuals: How politicians manage their mediated visibility in
the press
Åsa Kroon Lundell 219–236

Metaphors we vote by: The case of ‘marriage’ in contemporary Serbian political
discourse
Tatjana Đurović and Nadežda Silaški 237–259

Governing ‘others’: The (m)other as subject in the US family planning discourses
Mihnea Panu 260–280

Black face, white voice: Rush Limbaugh and the “message” of race
Nassira Nicola 281–309

Representations of Islam in British broadsheet and tabloid newspapers 1999–2005
Paul Baker 310–338


Linguistic Field(s): Semantics
                            Discourse Analysis
                            Sociolinguistics

Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issue



Page Updated: 27-Jul-2010

Supported in part by the National Science Foundation       About LINGUIST    |   Contact Us       ILIT Logo
While the LINGUIST List makes every effort to ensure the linguistic relevance of sites listed on its pages, it cannot vouch for their contents.