* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
LINGUIST List logo Eastern Michigan University Wayne State University *
* People & Organizations * Jobs * Calls & Conferences * Publications * Language Resources * Text & Computer Tools * Teaching & Learning * Mailing Lists * Search *
* *
LINGUIST List 21.3100

Wed Jul 28 2010

Calls: Pragmatics, Socioling/United Kingdom

Editor for this issue: Di Wdzenczny <dilinguistlist.org>


LINGUIST is pleased to announce the launch of an exciting new feature: Easy Abstracts! Easy Abs is a free abstract submission and review facility designed to help conference organizers and reviewers accept and process abstracts online. Just go to: http://www.linguistlist.org/confcustom, and begin your conference customization process today! With Easy Abstracts, submission and review will be as easy as 1-2-3!
Directory
        1.    Theodossia-Soula Pavlidou, Constructing Collectivity: 'We' in interaction

Message 1: Constructing Collectivity: 'We' in interaction
Date: 28-Jul-2010
From: Theodossia-Soula Pavlidou <pavlidoulit.auth.gr>
Subject: Constructing Collectivity: 'We' in interaction
E-mail this message to a friend

Full Title: Constructing Collectivity: 'We' in interaction

Date: 03-Jul-2011 - 08-Jul-2011
Location: Manchester, United Kingdom
Contact Person: Theodossia-Soula Pavlidou
Meeting Email: pavlidoulit.auth.gr
Web Site: http://ipra.ua.ac.be/main.aspx?c=.CONFERENCE12&n=1403

Linguistic Field(s): Pragmatics; Sociolinguistics

Call Deadline: 10-Sep-2010

Meeting Description:

The first person plural, represented here for convenience through the
pronoun 'we' -the prototypical marker of group indexicality (cf. Mühlhäusler
& Harré 1990)-, offers itself to various strands of linguistic/pragmatic inquiry,
including the study of subjectivity, speaker deixis, personal pronouns,
person reference/formulation, etc. However, the topic has been given
equally little attention in all these areas, especially with respect to
languages other than English. Only recently, research on 'we' seems to
have gained some impetus (cf. e.g. Assouline 2010, Bazzanella 2009,
Borthen 2010, Duszak 2002, Lerner & Kitzinger 2007, Pavlidou 2008,
Stewart 2001, Temmerman 2008); no coherent picture, though, is yet
emergent.

The aim of the panel is to bring together scholars who will explore the
workings of 'we' in interaction, in particular, how speakers present
themselves as members/part of a group or collectivity by exploiting the
means that different languages have to offer. At the intersection of
pragmatics with grammar, the panel will focus on the following issues: (a)
What can speakers do referentially with the first person plural 'we' (cf. e.g.
the so-called impersonal, royal, directive uses of 'we') in different
languages? (b) What is the role of the free-standing subject pronoun 'we' in
null-subject languages? Does this pronoun preserve the referential uses of
'we'? Is there something specific to 'we' as compared to other free-standing
subject pronouns? (c) What is the contribution of the plural number to the
construction of the 'we'-collectivity as opposed to 'they' or 'you-PLURAL'?
How does 'we' as a minimal recognitional form relate to other phrases that
allow collective reference (e.g. 'we, Europeans,' or 'Mary, Ann and I')? (d)
How do speakers manage self-representation as individual vs. collective
subjects (of varying degrees of abstraction, e.g. subset of participants vs.
general social categories)? How is inclusion/exclusion of others achieved?
What does self- or other-repair (from e.g. 'we' to 'I') tell us about e.g.
claiming collective agency, dispersing personal responsibility, maintaining
allegiances?

What is ultimately of interest is the dynamic process of delineating and (re-
)constructing collective subjects that arises, among other things, from the
inherent fluidity and vagueness of 'we' (as opposed to 'I', within the same
stretch of discourse), and how this process gets accomplished across
different interactional contexts and languages.

Call For Papers

Presentations addressing (some of) the above or similar issues, especially
with respect to non-Indo-European languages, are invited. Given the
panel's orientation to interaction, contributions based on naturalistic data,
adopting a Conversation Analysis perspective, are most welcome, although
other theoretical approaches are not excluded either.

Abstracts (not exceeding 500 words) should be sent as an email attachment
to Theodossia-Soula Pavlidou (pavlidoulit.auth.gr) before September 10,
2010. Notifications of acceptance/rejection will be sent out by the beginning
of October 2010.

Please note that:
- abstracts should not be programmatic and, if accepted by the organizer of
the panel, they will also have to be submitted individually via the IPrA
conference site before October 29, 2010 (http://ipra.ua.ac.be/main.aspx?
c=.CONFERENCE12&n=1403 ),
- IPrA membership is presupposed both for submitting an abstract to the
organizers of the IPrA conference and for participating in the conference,
- multiple contributions by the same person as first or single author are not
accepted.
Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issue



Page Updated: 28-Jul-2010

Supported in part by the National Science Foundation       About LINGUIST    |   Contact Us       ILIT Logo
While the LINGUIST List makes every effort to ensure the linguistic relevance of sites listed on its pages, it cannot vouch for their contents.