LINGUIST List 21.3347 Thu Aug 19 2010 TOC: Interpreting 12/2 (2010) Editor for this issue: Dayn Schulert <daynlinguistlist.org> Directory         1.    Paul Peranteau, Interpreting Vol. 12, No. 2 (2010) Message 1: Interpreting Vol. 12, No. 2 (2010) Date: 19-Aug-2010 From: Paul Peranteau <paulbenjamins.com> Subject: Interpreting Vol. 12, No. 2 (2010) E-mail this message to a friend Publisher: John Benjamins http://www.benjamins.com/ Journal Title: Interpreting Volume Number: 12 Issue Number: 2 Issue Date: 2010 Main Text: Interpreting 12:2 2010. iii, 158 pp. Table of contents Articles Interpreting in Nazi concentration camps during World War II Malgorzata Tryuk 125–145 Creativity in interpreting Ildikó Horváth 146–159 Interpreter-mediated scriptures: Expectation and performance Jill Karlik 160–185 Shifts in the language of interpretation with bi- or multi-lingual clients: Circumstances and implications for interpreters Jim Hlavac 186–213 Much ado about something remote: Stress and performance in remote interpreting Ilan Roziner and Miriam Shlesinger 214–247 Book Reviews Franz Pöchhacker, Arnt Lykke Jakobsen and Inger Mees (Eds.). Interpreting studies and beyond: A tribute to Miriam Shlesinger. Reviewed by Birgitta Englund Dimitrova 249–258 Nataly Kelly. Telephone interpreting: A comprehensive guide to the profession Reviewed by Uldis Ozolins 259–262 Marlene Verhoef and Theodorus du Plessis (Eds.). Multilingualism and educational interpreting: Innovation and delivery Reviewed by Erik Hertog 263–267 Kumiko Torikai. Voices of the invisible presence: Diplomatic interpreters in post-World War II Japan Reviewed by Dörte Andres 268–272 Jemina Napier (Ed.). International perspectives on sign language interpreter education Reviewed by Cynthia Jane Kellett Bidoli 273–279 Linguistic Field(s): Translation Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issue Page Updated: 19-Aug-2010       About LINGUIST    |   Contact Us       While the LINGUIST List makes every effort to ensure the linguistic relevance of sites listed on its pages, it cannot vouch for their contents.