LINGUIST List 21.35
|
Tue Jan 05 2010
TOC: Annals of Dyslexia 59/1 (2009)
Editor for this issue: Fatemeh Abdollahi
<fatemeh linguistlist.org>
|
Directory
1. Jasper
de Vaal,
Annals of Dyslexia Vol 59, No 1 (2009)
Message 1: Annals of Dyslexia Vol 59, No 1 (2009)
|
Date: 23-Dec-2009
From: Jasper de Vaal <jasper.devaal springer.com>
Subject: Annals of Dyslexia Vol 59, No 1 (2009)
E-mail this message to a friend
Publisher: Springer
http://www.springer.com
Journal Title: Annals of Dyslexia
Volume Number: 59
Issue Number: 1
Issue Date: 2009
Main Text:
The role of gene DCDC2 in German dyslexics A. Wilcke, J. Weissfuss, H. Kirsten, G. Wolfram, J. Boltze and P. Ahnert http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11881-008-0020-7 1-11 The role of visual and phonological representations in the processing of written words by readers with diagnosed dyslexia: evidence from a working memory task Paul Miller and Amirit Kupfermann http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11881-009-0021-1 12-33 Effects of fluency, oral language, and executive function on reading comprehension performance Laurie E. Cutting, April Materek, Carolyn A. S. Cole, Terry M. Levine and E. Mark Mahone http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11881-009-0022-0 34-54 Artificial grammar learning in primary school children with and without developmental dyslexia Elpis V. Pavlidou, Joanne M. Williams and Louise M. Kelly http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11881-009-0023-z 55-77 Phonological awareness predicts activation patterns for print and speech Stephen J. Frost, Nicole Landi, W. Einar Mencl, Rebecca Sandak, Robert K. Fulbright, Eleanor T. Tejada, Leslie Jacobsen, Elena L. Grigorenko, R. Todd Constable and Kenneth R. Pugh http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11881-009-0024-y 78-97
Linguistic Field(s):
Neurolinguistics
Phonology
Cognitive Science
Ling & Literature
Psycholinguistics
Subject Language(s): German, Standard (deu)
Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issue
|
|

Please report any bad links or misclassified data
LINGUIST Homepage | Read
LINGUIST | Contact us

While the LINGUIST List makes every effort to ensure the linguistic relevance of sites listed on its pages, it cannot vouch for their contents.
|
|