* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
LINGUIST List logo Eastern Michigan University Wayne State University *
* People & Organizations * Jobs * Calls & Conferences * Publications * Language Resources * Text & Computer Tools * Teaching & Learning * Mailing Lists * Search *
* *
LINGUIST List 21.3618

Mon Sep 13 2010

TOC: Canadian Modern Language Review 66/5 (2010)

Editor for this issue: Susanne Vejdemo <susannelinguistlist.org>

        1.    Journals Dept, Canadian Modern Language Review Vol 66, No 5 (2010)

Message 1: Canadian Modern Language Review Vol 66, No 5 (2010)
Date: 08-Sep-2010
From: Journals Dept <journalsutpress.utoronto.ca>
Subject: Canadian Modern Language Review Vol 66, No 5 (2010)
E-mail this message to a friend

Publisher: University of Toronto Press

Journal Title: Canadian Modern Language Review
Volume Number: 66
Issue Number: 5
Issue Date: 2010

Main Text:

Canadian Modern Language Review / La Revue canadienne des langues vivantes
Volume 66, Number 5 / August 2010 is now available at

This issue contains:

Pratiques de littératie à l'école. Pour une approche ethnographique de la classe en
deuxième année d'immersion en Colombie-Britannique
Danièle Moore, Cécile Sabatier
DOI: 10.3138/cmlr.66.5.639

Toward Understanding the Academic Trajectories of ESL Youth
Bruce Garnett
DOI: 10.3138/cmlr.66.5.677

The Impact of L2 Dialect on Learning French Vowels: Native English Speakers
Learning Québécois and European French
Wendy Baker, Laura Catharine Smith

DOI: 10.3138/cmlr.66.5.711

Teaching Pragmatics to L2 Learners for the Workplace: The Job Interview
Kerry J. Louw, Tracey M. Derwing, Marilyn L. Abbott

DOI: 10.3138/cmlr.66.5.739

Book and Software Reviews / Critiques de livres et de logiciels
DOI: 10.3138/cmlr.66.5.759

Linguistic Field(s): Language Acquisition
                            Applied Linguistics

Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issue

Page Updated: 13-Sep-2010

Supported in part by the National Science Foundation       About LINGUIST    |   Contact Us       ILIT Logo
While the LINGUIST List makes every effort to ensure the linguistic relevance of sites listed on its pages, it cannot vouch for their contents.