LINGUIST List 21.3851 Sat Oct 02 2010 TOC: Reading and Writing 23/9 (2010) Editor for this issue: Susanne Vejdemo <susannelinguistlist.org> Directory         1.    Jasper de Vaal, Reading and Writing Vol 23, No 9 (2010) Message 1: Reading and Writing Vol 23, No 9 (2010) Date: 30-Sep-2010 From: Jasper de Vaal <jasper.devaalspringer.com> Subject: Reading and Writing Vol 23, No 9 (2010) E-mail this message to a friend Publisher: Springer http://www.springer.com Journal Title: Reading and Writing Volume Number: 23 Issue Number: 9 Issue Date: 2010 Main Text: The table of contents for the latest issue of Reading & Writing can be found here: http://www.springerlink.com/content/0922-4777/23/9/ Table of Contents Reading and spelling acquisition in Thai children 1021-1053 Heather Winskel and Kanyarat Iemwanthong Developmental stability and changes in the impact of root consistency on children’s spelling 1055-1069 S. Hélène Deacon and Sarah Dhooge Individual differences in reading comprehension gains from assisted reading practice: pre existing conditions, vocabulary acquisition, and amounts of practice 1071-1083 Michal Shany and Andrew Biemiller Developmental changes in character-complexity and word-length effects when reading Chinese script 1085-1108 Yi-Fen Su and S. Jay Samuels A randomized experiment of a mixed-methods literacy intervention for struggling readers in grades 4–6: effects on word reading efficiency, reading comprehension and vocabulary, and oral reading fluency 1109-1129 James S. Kim, Jennifer F. Samson, Robert Fitzgerald and Ardice Hartry Linguistic Field(s): Psycholinguistics                             Writing Systems                             Cognitive Science                             Language Acquisition                             Neurolinguistics Subject Language(s): Chinese, Mandarin (cmn)                             Thai (tha) Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issue Page Updated: 02-Oct-2010       About LINGUIST    |   Contact Us       While the LINGUIST List makes every effort to ensure the linguistic relevance of sites listed on its pages, it cannot vouch for their contents.