* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
LINGUIST List logo Eastern Michigan University Wayne State University *
* People & Organizations * Jobs * Calls & Conferences * Publications * Language Resources * Text & Computer Tools * Teaching & Learning * Mailing Lists * Search *
* *
LINGUIST List 21.4104

Sat Oct 16 2010

TOC: Machine Translation 24/1 (2010)

Editor for this issue: Susanne Vejdemo <susannelinguistlist.org>

Directory
        1.     Jasper de Vaal , Machine Translation Vol 24, No 1 (2010)

Message 1: Machine Translation Vol 24, No 1 (2010)
Date: 14-Oct-2010
From: Jasper de Vaal <jasper.devaalspringer.com>
Subject: Machine Translation Vol 24, No 1 (2010)
E-mail this message to a friend

Publisher: Springer
http://www.springer.com

Journal Title: Machine Translation
Volume Number: 24
Issue Number: 1
Issue Date: 2010


Subtitle: Topics in Machine Translation Evaluation


Main Text:

Special Issue: Topics in Machine Translation Evaluation

Guest Edited by Alon Lavie and Mark Przybocki

Eye tracking as an MT evaluation technique
S. Doherty, S. O'Brien, M. Carl
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s/10590-010-9070-9
1-13

Metrics for MT evaluation: evaluating reordering
Alexandra Birch, Miles Osborne and Phil Blunsom
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10590-009-9066-5
15-26

Metric and reference factors in minimum error rate training
Yifan He and Andy Way
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10590-010-9072-7
27-38

Machine translation evaluation versus quality estimation
Lucia Specia, Dhwaj Raj and Marco Turchi
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10590-010-9077-2
39-50

Significance tests of automatic machine translation evaluation metrics
Ying Zhang and Stephan Vogel
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10590-010-9073-6
51-65


Linguistic Field(s): Psycholinguistics
                            Translation
                            Computational Linguistics

Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issue



Page Updated: 16-Oct-2010

Supported in part by the National Science Foundation       About LINGUIST    |   Contact Us       ILIT Logo
While the LINGUIST List makes every effort to ensure the linguistic relevance of sites listed on its pages, it cannot vouch for their contents.