* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
LINGUIST List logo Eastern Michigan University Wayne State University *
* People & Organizations * Jobs * Calls & Conferences * Publications * Language Resources * Text & Computer Tools * Teaching & Learning * Mailing Lists * Search *
* *
LINGUIST List 21.4110

Sat Oct 16 2010

Calls: Morphology, Syntax/Spain

Editor for this issue: Di Wdzenczny <dilinguistlist.org>


LINGUIST is pleased to announce the launch of an exciting new feature: Easy Abstracts! Easy Abs is a free abstract submission and review facility designed to help conference organizers and reviewers accept and process abstracts online. Just go to: http://www.linguistlist.org/confcustom, and begin your conference customization process today! With Easy Abstracts, submission and review will be as easy as 1-2-3!
Directory
        1.     Mirjam Fried , Ethical Datives and Related Constructions

Message 1: Ethical Datives and Related Constructions
Date: 15-Oct-2010
From: Mirjam Fried <friedujc.cas.cz>
Subject: Ethical Datives and Related Constructions
E-mail this message to a friend

Full Title: Ethical Datives and Related Constructions

Date: 08-Sep-2011 - 11-Sep-2011
Location: Logroño, Spain
Contact Person: Mirjam Fried
Meeting Email: friedujc.cas.cz
Web Site: http://www.societaslinguistica.eu

Linguistic Field(s): Morphology; Syntax

Call Deadline: 05-Nov-2010

Meeting Description:

Workshop 'Ethical Datives and Related Constructions'
Within the 44th Annual Meeting of Societas Linguistica Europaea (SLE)
Logroño, Spain, 8-11 September 2010

Convenors:
Mirjam Fried, Czech Academy of Sciences (Prague)
Francesca Masini, Roma Tre University/University of Bologna

Call For Papers

Potential participants should send us a provisional title and a short
abstract (max. 200 words) no later than November 5, 2010, so that we can
submit the workshop proposal (including a preliminary list of participants) to
the SLE Scientific Committee by November 15, 2010.

If the workshop is accepted, all abstracts will have to be submitted to the
SLE by January 15, 2011 via the conference site (http://sle2011.cilap.es/).

The label Ethical Dative appears frequently in the literature on dative
marking and on argument structure, as well as in traditional grammars of
various European languages. It refers to a dative-marked personal pronoun
that is not required by the valence of the verb and tends to be interpreted,
broadly, as an expression of the referent's interest in the described event.
Current understanding of the topic is rather sketchy and impressionistic,
and Ethical Dative is far from being a well-defined grammatical category. A
comprehensive cross-linguistic overview of the phenomenon is still missing
and its contours, including its relationship to other dative constructions, are
still to be traced. The goal of this workshop is to start filling this gap by
bringing together scholars whose research concentrates on the issues
surrounding certain pronominal datives in various languages and whose
contributions can advance our understanding of this topic.

The workshop contributions are expected to shed light on Ethical Datives by
providing more accurate and informative linguistic descriptions of relevant
empirical material, thereby also leading toward a well-grounded
characterization of Ethical Datives as a distinct linguistic category.
Therefore, we welcome contributions that aim at getting:

a) a clearer idea about the spread of Ethical Datives and related
constructions in the languages of the world;
b) a better understanding of their 'form', such as the role of the case (e.g.,
why dative?), the clitic status of the form, the interaction with voice
(reflexives, middles, etc.);
c) a better understanding of the 'meaning' or 'function' pole of these
constructions, e.g. the semantic roles involved (benefactive, malefactive,
affectee, etc.), the interaction with argument structure and verb classes;
pragmatic function(s) in discourse, possible textual restrictions;
d) a better definition of the domain that properly delimits Ethical Datives with
respect to related constructions, such as External Possessors, Middles,
Ditransitives, Applicatives, Miratives;
e) suitable theoretical proposals that would account for the attested
patterns.
Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issue



Page Updated: 16-Oct-2010

Supported in part by the National Science Foundation       About LINGUIST    |   Contact Us       ILIT Logo
While the LINGUIST List makes every effort to ensure the linguistic relevance of sites listed on its pages, it cannot vouch for their contents.