LINGUIST List 21.4382
|
Tue Nov 02 2010
Qs: Predicate Adjectives Requiring PP Complements
Editor for this issue: Danielle St. Jean
<danielle linguistlist.org>
|
We'd like to remind readers that the responses to queries are usually best posted to the individual asking the question. That individual is then strongly encouraged to post a summary to the list. This policy was instituted to help control the huge volume of mail on LINGUIST; so we would appreciate your cooperating with it whenever it seems appropriate. In addition to posting a summary, we'd like to remind people that it is usually a good idea to personally thank those individuals who have taken the trouble to respond to the query. To post to LINGUIST, use our convenient web form at http://linguistlist.org/LL/posttolinguist.cfm.
|
Directory
1. Sarah Hunt ,
Predicate Adjectives Requiring PP Complements
Message 1: Predicate Adjectives Requiring PP Complements
|
Date: 01-Nov-2010
From: Sarah Hunt <smhunt uci.edu>
Subject: Predicate Adjectives Requiring PP Complements
E-mail this message to a friend
Dear LINGUIST List Members, I'm a research assistant in a syntax lab at UC Irvine, and I'm working on a project that examines how the brain stores lexemes' syntactic information. This research would eventually go towards a journal article. This project focuses on predicate adjectives like "fond" that require a PP complement (presumably for thematic and case reasons) in English: John is fond of the book *John is fond I am having trouble finding more of these. So far, two other people and myself have been going through lists of adjectives and testing each one for this criteria. But we're not having much success. I was wondering if anyone knows of a paper or book with a list of these, or even just happens to know a few other examples. I will post a summary of the responses. Thanks! Sarah Hunt
Linguistic Field(s):
Cognitive Science
Psycholinguistics
Syntax
Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issue
|
|
Page Updated: 02-Nov-2010
|
|
About LINGUIST
|
Contact Us
While the LINGUIST List makes every effort to ensure the linguistic relevance of sites listed
on its pages, it cannot vouch for their contents.
|
|