LINGUIST List 21.4524
|
Thu Nov 11 2010
Confs: Phonology, Syntax/Netherlands
Editor for this issue: Di Wdzenczny
<di linguistlist.org>
|
LINGUIST is pleased to announce the launch of an exciting new feature: Easy Abstracts! Easy Abs is a free abstract submission and review facility designed to help conference organizers and reviewers accept and process abstracts online. Just go to: http://www.linguistlist.org/confcustom, and begin your conference customization process today! With Easy Abstracts, submission and review will be as easy as 1-2-3!
|
Directory
1. Roberta D'Alessandro ,
Morphosyntax-Phonology Interface Theories
Message 1: Morphosyntax-Phonology Interface Theories
|
Date: 10-Nov-2010
From: Roberta D'Alessandro <r.dalessandro hum.leidenuniv.nl>
Subject: Morphosyntax-Phonology Interface Theories
E-mail this message to a friend
Morphosyntax-Phonology Interface Theories Date: 08-Dec-2010 - 08-Dec-2010 Location: Leiden, Netherlands Contact: Roberta D'Alessandro Contact Email: r.dalessandro hum.leidenuniv.nl Meeting URL: http://hum.leiden.edu/lucl/research/conferences/upcoming- conferences/morphosyntax-phonology-interface-theorie.html Linguistic Field(s): Phonology; Syntax Meeting Description: LUCL Leiden, the Meertens Instituut (KNAW) and Mouton de Gruyter are very happy to announce a workshop on Morphosyntax-Phonology Interface Theories to be held in Leiden on December 8, 2010. The workshop is centered around the topics addressed in Tobias Scheer's latest book 'A Guide to Morphosyntax-Phonology Interface Theories. How Extra-Phonological Information is treated in Phonology since Trubetzkoy's Grenzsignale', which reviews the history of morphosyntax-phonology interface from structuralism until phase theory. The questions to be addressed include: -What should a good interface theory look like? -To what extent is modularity required in a theory of language? -How can we use properties of morpho-syntactic theory to argue for or against competing theories of phonology (and vice-versa)? -Mainly representational models (like prosodic phonology) alternate historically with mainly derivational ones (like phase theory). However, exclusively representational or exclusively derivational models do not seem to be plausible. Where can we draw the line between derivation and representation? How much derivation is needed, and how much representation, to account for interface events? On this occasion, Tobias Scheer's book will also be presented. Invited speakers: - Lisa Cheng - David Embick - Pavel Iosad - Rita Manzini - Marc van Oostendorp - Andres Saab & Anikó Liptak - Tobias Scheer All interested are welcome to attend.
Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issue
|
|
Page Updated: 11-Nov-2010
|
|
About LINGUIST
|
Contact Us
While the LINGUIST List makes every effort to ensure the linguistic relevance of sites listed
on its pages, it cannot vouch for their contents.
|
|