* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
LINGUIST List logo Eastern Michigan University Wayne State University *
* People & Organizations * Jobs * Calls & Conferences * Publications * Language Resources * Text & Computer Tools * Teaching & Learning * Mailing Lists * Search *
* *
LINGUIST List 21.4725

Wed Nov 24 2010

Books: Semantics/Syntax: Randall

Editor for this issue: Fatemeh Abdollahi <fatemehlinguistlist.org>


Links to the websites of all LINGUIST's supporting publishers are available at the end of this issue.
Directory
        1.     Jolanda Voogd , Linking: Randall

Message 1: Linking: Randall
Date: 18-Nov-2010
From: Jolanda Voogd <Jolanda.Voogdspringer.com>
Subject: Linking: Randall
E-mail this message to a friend

Title: Linking
Subtitle: The Geometry of Argument Structure
Series Title: Studies in Natural Language and Linguistic Theory
Published: 2010
Publisher: Springer
                http://www.springer.com

Book URL: http://www.springer.com/education+%26+language/linguistics/book/978-94-007-0532-6?changeHeade

Author: Janet H. Randall
Paperback: ISBN: 9789400705326 Pages: 344 Price: Europe EURO 79.95
Abstract:

Please Note: This is a new version of a previously announced text.

Linking -- how semantic arguments map to the syntax -- is one of the
challenges for theories of the syntax-semantics interface. In this new
approach, Janet Randall explores the hypothesis that the positions of
syntactic arguments are strictly determined by lexical argument geometry.
Yielding novel -- if sometimes surprising -- conclusions, her Isomorphic
Linking Hypothesis establishes the linking patterns of a wide range of
verbs and, with those results, shows how to reason "backwards" from how a
given verb's arguments link to what its lexical representation must be.
Along the way, the investigation takes on thorny lexical issues --
reformulating the Theta Criterion, revisiting the multiple lexical-entry
debate, eliminating "indirect" arguments and redefining unaccusativity. It
offers new insights into how arguments are represented, assembles a host of
argument/adjunct diagnostics, and re-examines the relation between
arguments and predicates. The result of this incisive study is a simple and
consistent account of linking, integrated with a radical rethinking of the
nature of arguments and argument structure.


From the reviews:

"Janet Randall's Linking: The Geometry of Argument Structure, is an
authoritative journey through a minefield of critical problems. Arguing a
symmetry between conceptual structure and argument structure, it will
richly reward those readers who do themselves the favor of taking the trip."
Samuel Jay Keyser, Professor Emeritus, MIT


"In this book, Janet Randall, building on much recent research, develops
her own version of a geometrical theory of the lexicon and explores a
restrictive hypothesis on how lexical entries project into syntactic
structure, based on structure preservation. Even those who, like myself,
are not so inclined to think of word meaning in geometric terms, will find
in this book a striking series of puzzles, challenges, and insights."
Gennaro Chierchia, Haas Foundations Professor of Linguistics, Harvard
University


"Janet Randall's book is a model of how to reason across the interface
between conceptual structure and syntax. It is a goldmine of razor sharp
observations about argument structure and morphology. Each theoretical step
is supported by carefully developed empirical evidence. It will be a
lasting accomplishment at both the theoretical and empirical level."
Tom Roeper, University of Massachusetts, Amherst

Linguistic Field(s): Semantics
                            Syntax

Subject Language(s): English (eng)

Written In: English (eng )

See this book announcement on our website:
http://linguistlist.org/pubs/books/get-book.cfm?BookID=51586


Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issue

-------------------------- Major Supporters --------------------------
Brill http://www.brill.nl
Cambridge Scholars Publishing http://www.c-s-p.org
Cambridge University Press http://us.cambridge.org
Cascadilla Press http://www.cascadilla.com/
Continuum International Publishing Group Ltd http://www.continuumbooks.com
De Gruyter Mouton http://www.degruyter.com/mouton
Edinburgh University Press http://www.eup.ed.ac.uk/
Elsevier Ltd http://www.elsevier.com/linguistics
Emerald Group Publishing Limited http://www.emeraldinsight.com/
Equinox Publishing Ltd http://www.equinoxpub.com/
European Language Resources Association - ELRA http://www.elra.info.
Georgetown University Press http://www.press.georgetown.edu
John Benjamins http://www.benjamins.com/
Lincom GmbH http://www.lincom.eu
MIT Press http://mitpress.mit.edu/
Morgan & Claypool Publishers
Multilingual Matters http://www.multilingual-matters.com/
Narr Francke Attempto Verlag GmbH + Co. KG http://www.narr.de/
Oxford University Press http://www.oup.com/us
Palgrave Macmillan http://www.palgrave.com
Peter Lang AG http://www.peterlang.com
Rodopi http://www.rodopi.nl/
Routledge (Taylor and Francis) http://www.routledge.com/
Springer http://www.springer.com
University of Toronto Press http://www.utpjournals.com/
Wiley-Blackwell http://www.wiley.com

---------------------- Other Supporting Publishers ----------------------
Association of Editors of the Journal of Portuguese Linguistics http://www.fl.ul.pt/revistas/JPL/JPLweb.htm
Graduate Linguistic Students' Association, Umass http://glsa.hypermart.net/
International Pragmatics Assoc. http://www.ipra.be
Langues et Linguistique http://y.ennaji.free.fr/fr/
Linguistic Association of Finland http://www.ling.helsinki.fi/sky/
Netherlands Graduate School of Linguistics / Landelijke - LOT http://www.lotpublications.nl/
Pacific Linguistics http://pacling.anu.edu.au/
SIL International http://www.ethnologue.com/bookstore.asp
St. Jerome Publishing Ltd http://www.stjerome.co.uk
Utrecht institute of Linguistics http://www-uilots.let.uu.nl/



Page Updated: 24-Nov-2010

Supported in part by the National Science Foundation       About LINGUIST    |   Contact Us       ILIT Logo
While the LINGUIST List makes every effort to ensure the linguistic relevance of sites listed on its pages, it cannot vouch for their contents.