LINGUIST List 21.4817 Tue Nov 30 2010 TOC: Diachronica 27/3 (2010) Editor for this issue: Justin Petro <justinlinguistlist.org> Directory         1.     Paul Peranteau , Diachronica Vol. 27, No. 3 (2010) Message 1: Diachronica Vol. 27, No. 3 (2010) Date: 28-Nov-2010 From: Paul Peranteau <paulbenjamins.com> Subject: Diachronica Vol. 27, No. 3 (2010) E-mail this message to a friend Publisher: John Benjamins http://www.benjamins.com/ Journal Title: Diachronica Volume Number: 27 Issue Number: 3 Issue Date: 2010 Main Text: Diachronica 27:3 2010. iii, 152 pp. Table of contents Articles / Aufsätze The grammaticalization of prospective aspect in a group of Neo-Aramaic dialects Eleanor Coghill 359–410 A case study in grammaticalized inflectional morphology: Origin and development of the Germanic weak preterite Eugen Hill 411–458 Parallel System Borrowing: Parallel morphological systems due to the borrowing of paradigms Maarten Kossmann 459–488 Reviews / Comptes rendus / Besprechungen Genitives in early English: Typology and evidence. By Cynthia Allen Reviewed by Östen Dahl 489–496 Constructions and Language Change. Edited by Alexander Bergs & Gabriele Diewald Reviewed by Matthew L. Juge 497–504 Editorial Joe’s Jottings 505–507 Contents of Volume 27 509–510 Linguistic Field(s): Historical Linguistics Subject Language(s): Assyrian Neo-Aramaic (aii)                             Western Neo-Aramaic (amw)                             Bohtan Neo-Aramaic (bhn)                             Barzani Jewish Neo-Aramaic (bjf)                             Chaldean Neo-Aramaic (cld)                             English (eng)                             Senaya (syn) Language Family(ies): Germanic New! Visit LL's Multitree project for over 1000 trees dynamically generated from scholarly hypotheses about language relationships:             http://multitree.linguistlist.org/ Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issue Page Updated: 30-Nov-2010       About LINGUIST    |   Contact Us       While the LINGUIST List makes every effort to ensure the linguistic relevance of sites listed on its pages, it cannot vouch for their contents.