LINGUIST List 21.4933 Tue Dec 07 2010 TOC: The Modern Language Journal 94/4 (2010) Editor for this issue: Justin Petro <justinlinguistlist.org> Directory         1.     Audrey Courchesne , The Modern Language Journal Vol. 94, No. 4 (2010) Message 1: The Modern Language Journal Vol. 94, No. 4 (2010) Date: 06-Dec-2010 From: Audrey Courchesne <acourchesnewiley.com> Subject: The Modern Language Journal Vol. 94, No. 4 (2010) E-mail this message to a friend Publisher: Wiley-Blackwell http://www.wiley.com Journal Title: The Modern Language Journal Volume Number: 94 Issue Number: 4 Issue Date: Winter 2010 Main Text: To read The Modern Language Journal Volume 94 Issue 4 visit http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/modl.2010.94.issue-4/issuetoc MLJ Articles: Can Talk Be Inconsequential? Social and Interactional Aspects of Elicited Second-Language Interaction (pages 537–553) Thorsten Huth Suprasegmental Measures of Accentedness and Judgments of Language Learner Proficiency in Oral English (pages 554–566) Okim Kang, Don Rubin and Lucy Pickering Word Recognition in Arabic as a Foreign Language (pages 567–581) Gunna Funder Hansen Negative Evidence and Its Explicitness and Positioning in the Learning of Korean as a Heritage Language (pages 582–599) Hyun-Sook Kang The Relationship Among Motivation, Interaction, and the Development of Second Language Oral Proficiency in a Study-Abroad Context (pages 600–617) Todd A. Hernández Factors Influencing Self-Efficacy Judgments of University Students in Foreign Language Tutoring (pages 618–635) Paul Harvey Matthews Visit the issue online for more including Perspectives, Commentaries, News & Notes of the Profession, and Reviews. Linguistic Field(s): Language Acquisition                             Applied Linguistics Subject Language(s): Arabic, Standard (arb)                             Korean (kor) Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issue Page Updated: 07-Dec-2010       About LINGUIST    |   Contact Us       While the LINGUIST List makes every effort to ensure the linguistic relevance of sites listed on its pages, it cannot vouch for their contents.