LINGUIST List 21.5060 Tue Dec 14 2010 Calls: Indo-European, Historical Ling, Syntax, Typology/Greece Editor for this issue: Amy Brunett <brunettlinguistlist.org> New! Visit LL's Multitree project for over 1000 trees dynamically generated from scholarly hypotheses about language relationships:             http://multitree.linguistlist.org/ LINGUIST is pleased to announce the launch of an exciting new feature: Easy Abstracts! Easy Abs is a free abstract submission and review facility designed to help conference organizers and reviewers accept and process abstracts online. Just go to: http://www.linguistlist.org/confcustom, and begin your conference customization process today! With Easy Abstracts, submission and review will be as easy as 1-2-3! Directory         1.     Leonid Kulikov , Workshop on Proto-Indo-European Syntax and its Development Message 1: Workshop on Proto-Indo-European Syntax and its Development Date: 13-Dec-2010 From: Leonid Kulikov <L.Kulikovhum.leidenuniv.nl> Subject: Workshop on Proto-Indo-European Syntax and its Development E-mail this message to a friend Full Title: Workshop on Proto-Indo-European Syntax and its Development Date: 01-Apr-2011 - 03-Apr-2011 Location: Thessaloniki, Greece Contact Person: Nikolaos Lavidas Meeting Email: < click here to access email > Web Site: http://www.enl.auth.gr/ISTAL20/workshop.htm Linguistic Field(s): Historical Linguistics; Syntax; Typology Language Family(ies): Indo-European Call Deadline: 30-Dec-2010 Meeting Description: Keynote speakers: Georgios Giannakis (University of Thessaloniki), Giuseppe Longobardi (University of Trieste) December 30, 2010: deadline for submitting abstracts January 31, 2011: notification of acceptance April 1-3, 2011: PIE Syntax and its development Keynote Speakers: Georgios Giannakis (University of Thessaloniki) 'Tmesis and Univerbation in Indo-European' Guiseppe Longobardi (University of Trieste) 'How to probe history with grammars' The last decades are marked with an increasing interest towards the study of archaic syntax of Indo-European languages and, eventually, towards reconstruction of the main features of the Proto-Indo-European syntax. Suffice it to mention, among many others (in chronological order) Lehmann 1974, Kortlandt 1983, Hettrich 1990, Giannakis 1997, Bauer 2000, Boley 2004, Barðdal & Smitherman 2009, Barðdal & Eythórsson 2010, Barðdal 2011, adding much to our knowledge based on such seminal works on the ancient Indo-European syntax as Delbrück 1893-97 or Hirt 1934-37. Although for some scholars the very opportunity of a syntactic reconstruction remains questionable, numerous studies have appeared which reconstruct a variety of basic elements of the Proto-Indo-European syntax, on the basis of evidence available from, above all, ancient and/or archaic Indo-European languages. Such aspects of the proto-language as ergative/active type of alignment, basic word order, subject and object marking and some others have given rise to vivid discussions both between Indo-Europeanists and typologists. Furthermore, the possibility of an efficient lexically blind system of syntactic comparison, precisely the parametric comparison method was first suggested in Longobardi (2003), Guardiano & Longobardi (2005). The idea of the conference is to bring together scholars interested in these and related problems and to open new perspectives in the research of the ancient Indo-European syntax. Special attention will be paid to the development of the hypothetical reconstructed features within the documented history of Indo-European languages. The workshop will be part of the 20th International Symposium on Theoretical & Applied Linguistics organized by the Department of Theoretical & Applied Linguistics of Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, to be held April 1-3, 2011 in Thessaloniki, Greece. Call for Papers: The issues to be addressed include: -Modern approaches to the analysis of the archaic Indo-European syntax and syntactic reconstruction; -Proto-Indo-European syntactic reconstruction and its contribution to linguistic theory; -Is a syntactic reconstruction possible? which syntactic features can be reconstructed? -Reconstruction of the alignment type (ergative/active etc.) and its morphological manifestations (cases, verbal morphology); -Transitivity, voice, middle, stative and related categories in early/late Proto-Indo-European and ancient Indo-European languages; -Can we reconstruct the labile syntactic type for Proto-Indo-European and what are the main types of the evolution of lability attested for Indo-European languages? -Reconstruction of PIE moods and their evolution in PIE languages; -IE and PIE tense, aspect and aktionsart (actionalities); -Word order and its evolution in PIE and IE; -Canonical and non-canonical subject and object marking in PIE and its development in IE languages; -Relative clauses and other types of subordinate clauses in PIE and their evolution; -Syntax of non-finite forms (infinitives, converbs, etc.). Please send us (nlavidasenl.auth.gr; L.Kulikovhum.LeidenUniv.nl) the one-page abstract of your paper no later than December 30, 2010. Please visit http://www.enl.auth.gr/ISTAL20, where you will also find practical information. Nikolaos Lavidas Aristotle University of Thessaloniki nlavidasenl.auth.gr Leonid Kulikov Leiden University / Institute of Linguistics, Moscow L.Kulikovhum.LeidenUniv.nl New! Visit LL's Multitree project for over 1000 trees dynamically generated from scholarly hypotheses about language relationships:             http://multitree.linguistlist.org/ Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issue Page Updated: 14-Dec-2010       About LINGUIST    |   Contact Us       While the LINGUIST List makes every effort to ensure the linguistic relevance of sites listed on its pages, it cannot vouch for their contents.