* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
LINGUIST List logo Eastern Michigan University Wayne State University *
* People & Organizations * Jobs * Calls & Conferences * Publications * Language Resources * Text & Computer Tools * Teaching & Learning * Mailing Lists * Search *
* *
LINGUIST List 22.192

Tue Jan 11 2011

Books: Applied Linguistics/Language Acquisition: Reinders

Editor for this issue: Fatemeh Abdollahi <fatemehlinguistlist.org>


Links to the websites of all LINGUIST's supporting publishers are available at the end of this issue.
Directory
        1.     Chris Humphrey , The Effects of Task Type and Instructions on Second Language Acquisition: Reinders

Message 1: The Effects of Task Type and Instructions on Second Language Acquisition: Reinders
Date: 23-Dec-2010
From: Chris Humphrey <chumphreyc-s-p.org>
Subject: The Effects of Task Type and Instructions on Second Language Acquisition: Reinders
E-mail this message to a friend

Title: The Effects of Task Type and Instructions on Second Language
Acquisition
Published: 2010
Publisher: Cambridge Scholars Publishing
                http://www.c-s-p.org

Author: Hayo Reinders
Hardback: ISBN: 9781443817783 Pages: 250 Price: U.K. £ 39.99
Abstract:

Recent years have seen a growing interest in the role of tasks in second
language acquisition and a substantial body of research now exists to show
their potential contribution to language learning and teaching. However,
not much is known about the effects of different task types, nor about
their accompanying instructions. Which tasks are more successful under what
circumstances? What type of instructions should be included? This book
attempts to answer the questions above by first examining previous studies
on the use of tasks, the roles of input, output and interaction, and by
placing these in a broader cognitive framework. It argues that in order to
understand the effects of different task types, it is important not only to
look at learning outcomes (acquisition), but also at the effects on
immediate task performance (intake), and by doing so, to arrive at a more
complete picture of the learning process. The book presents the results of
a study on the effects of 1) implicit and explicit inductive instructions
and 2) three task types on both intake and acquisition of two English
grammatical structures. The study used various measures to determine intake
as well as the development of both implicit and explicit knowledge. The
results of the study support the claims made for the benefits of
Focus-on-Form, but do not support the claims made for the benefits of more
explicit types of instruction. Further, the results show that there is no
direct relationship between intake and acquisition and that different task
types can have a differential effect on immediate task performance on the
one hand and learning on the other. The book discusses these findings in
the light of previous research and considers their implications both at the
theoretical level and for language teaching practice.

Linguistic Field(s): Applied Linguistics
                            Language Acquisition

Written In: English (eng )

See this book announcement on our website:
http://linguistlist.org/pubs/books/get-book.cfm?BookID=52431


Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issue

-------------------------- Major Supporters --------------------------
Continuum International Publishing Group Ltd http://www.continuumbooks.com
De Gruyter Mouton http://www.degruyter.com/mouton
Edinburgh University Press http://www.eup.ed.ac.uk/
Elsevier Ltd http://www.elsevier.com/linguistics
Equinox Publishing Ltd http://www.equinoxpub.com/
John Benjamins http://www.benjamins.com/
Multilingual Matters http://www.multilingual-matters.com/
Palgrave Macmillan http://www.palgrave.com

---------------------- Other Supporting Publishers ----------------------



Page Updated: 11-Jan-2011

Supported in part by the National Science Foundation       About LINGUIST    |   Contact Us       ILIT Logo
While the LINGUIST List makes every effort to ensure the linguistic relevance of sites listed on its pages, it cannot vouch for their contents.