* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
LINGUIST List logo Eastern Michigan University Wayne State University *
* People & Organizations * Jobs * Calls & Conferences * Publications * Language Resources * Text & Computer Tools * Teaching & Learning * Mailing Lists * Search *
* *
LINGUIST List 22.2361

Sat Jun 04 2011

Qs: Relative Clauses and the Accessibility Hierarchy

Editor for this issue: Danielle St. Jean <daniellelinguistlist.org>


We'd like to remind readers that the responses to queries are usually best posted to the individual asking the question. That individual is then strongly encouraged to post a summary to the list. This policy was instituted to help control the huge volume of mail on LINGUIST; so we would appreciate your cooperating with it whenever it seems appropriate.

In addition to posting a summary, we'd like to remind people that it is usually a good idea to personally thank those individuals who have taken the trouble to respond to the query.

To post to LINGUIST, use our convenient web form at http://linguistlist.org/LL/posttolinguist.cfm.
Directory
        1.     Anthony DeFazio , Relative Clauses and the Accessibility Hierarchy

Message 1: Relative Clauses and the Accessibility Hierarchy
Date: 02-Jun-2011
From: Anthony DeFazio <ajdefazaol.com>
Subject: Relative Clauses and the Accessibility Hierarchy
E-mail this message to a friend

Could someone point to some readable summary for students to explain
research on the Accessibility Hierarchy and ease of relative clause
formation for students in a TESOL program. They are especially
interested in how the L1 affects the research on relative clause
development. I will post a Summary if warranted.

Linguistic Field(s): Applied Linguistics


Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issue



Page Updated: 04-Jun-2011

Supported in part by the National Science Foundation       About LINGUIST    |   Contact Us       ILIT Logo
While the LINGUIST List makes every effort to ensure the linguistic relevance of sites listed on its pages, it cannot vouch for their contents.