LINGUIST List 22.2433 Sun Jun 12 2011 TOC: Language Policy 10/2 (2011) Editor for this issue: Justin Petro <justinlinguistlist.org> Directory         1.     Jolanda Voogd , Language Policy Vol. 10, No. 2 (2011) Message 1: Language Policy Vol. 10, No. 2 (2011) Date: 10-Jun-2011 From: Jolanda Voogd <Jolanda.Voogdspringer.com> Subject: Language Policy Vol. 10, No. 2 (2011) E-mail this message to a friend Publisher: Springer http://www.springer.com Journal Title: Language Policy Volume Number: 10 Issue Number: 2 Issue Date: 2011 Main Text: DOI: 10.1007/s10993-011-9196-5 Title: Political strategies and language policies: the European Union Lisbon strategy and its implications for the EU’s language and multilingualism policy Author(s): Michał Krzyżanowski and Ruth Wodak pages: 115-136 DOI: 10.1007/s10993-011-9200-0 Title: The campaign for Spanish language education in the “Colossus of the North,” 1914–1945 Author(s): Jeff Bale pages: 137-157 DOI: 10.1007/s10993-011-9201-z Title: Intended and unintended effects of language planning: insights from an orthography debate in Cyprus Author(s): Vasiliki Georgiou pages: 159-182 DOI: 10.1007/s10993-011-9195-6 Title: Book Review Adrian Blackledge and Angela Creese: Multilingualism: A Critical Perspective Author(s): Kristina de Korsak pages: 183-185 DOI: 10.1007/s10993-011-9197-4 Title: Book Review Wayne E. Wright: Foundations for Teaching English Language Learners, Research, Theory, Policy and Practice Author(s): Eugenia Mora-Flores pages: 187-188 DOI: 10.1007/s10993-011-9198-3 Title: Book Review Patricia Gándara and Megan Hopkins (eds): Forbidden Language: English Learners and Restrictive Language Policies Author(s): Irma M. Olmedo pages: 189-191 Linguistic Field(s): Applied Linguistics                             Sociolinguistics Subject Language(s): English (eng)                             Spanish (spa) Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issue Page Updated: 12-Jun-2011       About LINGUIST    |   Contact Us       While the LINGUIST List makes every effort to ensure the linguistic relevance of sites listed on its pages, it cannot vouch for their contents.