LINGUIST List 22.2641|
Fri Jun 24 2011
Qs: Innovation of Functional Categories
Editor for this issue: Brent Woo
New! Visit LL's Multitree project for over 1000 trees dynamically generated from scholarly hypotheses about language relationships:
We'd like to remind readers that the responses to queries are usually best posted to the individual asking the question. That individual is then strongly encouraged to post a summary to the list. This policy was instituted to help control the huge volume of mail on LINGUIST; so we would appreciate your cooperating with it whenever it seems appropriate.
In addition to posting a summary, we'd like to remind people that it is usually a good idea to personally thank those individuals who have taken the trouble to respond to the query.
To post to LINGUIST, use our convenient web form at http://linguistlist.org/LL/posttolinguist.cfm.
1. Juergen Bohnemeyer ,
Innovation of Functional Categories
Message 1: Innovation of Functional Categories
From: Juergen Bohnemeyer <jb77buffalo.edu>
Subject: Innovation of Functional Categories
E-mail this message to a friend
I'm looking for examples of functional categories - semantic distinctions
expressed by inflections and/or function words - that were clearly
innovated in a given language (family) at some point in a narrow sense
of the term 'innovation'. Specifically, I'm interested in cases that fulfill
both of the following criteria:
(i) One or more members of the particular language family at some
point grammaticalized a functional category that is not evidenced or
cannot be reconstructed in the common ancestor of the family
(ii) This grammaticalization was not in any obvious way contact-
induced; i.e., there is no conclusive evidence and no obvious candidate
for a model from which the newly minted category could have been
To put this another way, you could say that what I'm looking for are
neologisms of grammar. I will post a summary of the responses should
the responses warrant this.
Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issue
Page Updated: 24-Jun-2011
While the LINGUIST List makes every effort to ensure the linguistic relevance of sites listed
on its pages, it cannot vouch for their contents.