LINGUIST List 22.3133
|
Fri Aug 05 2011
Qs: Survey: Interlanguage Pragmatics
Editor for this issue: Danielle St. Jean
<danielle linguistlist.org>
|
We'd like to remind readers that the responses to queries are usually best posted to the individual asking the question. That individual is then strongly encouraged to post a summary to the list. This policy was instituted to help control the huge volume of mail on LINGUIST; so we would appreciate your cooperating with it whenever it seems appropriate. In addition to posting a summary, we'd like to remind people that it is usually a good idea to personally thank those individuals who have taken the trouble to respond to the query. To post to LINGUIST, use our convenient web form at http://linguistlist.org/LL/posttolinguist.cfm.
|
Directory
1. Maryam Pezeshki ,
Survey: Interlanguage Pragmatics
Message 1: Survey: Interlanguage Pragmatics
|
Date: 03-Aug-2011
From: Maryam Pezeshki <maryam_pezeshki yahoo.com>
Subject: Survey: Interlanguage Pragmatics
E-mail this message to a friend
Dear LINGUIST List members,
I'm preparing a multiple-choice test of pragmatics. I collected responses
provided by native and non-native speakers and now I need to identify
the appropriate answers from the inappropriate ones to write down the
four choices for my test. I wondered if there are any native speakers in
the list who could help me with this test, selecting the answers they
think are inapprppriate in each of the 19 situations in the test. The
responses you choose will function as distractors in my MC test and will
be of great help to me. The test appears in the following link:
http://FreeOnlineSurveys.com/rendersurvey.asp?sid=mzp2q4f0wmzb78u946337
Thank you for your help in advance. Best Regards, Maryam Pezeshki PhD student, ATU, Iran
Linguistic Field(s):
Applied Linguistics
Discourse Analysis
Language Acquisition
Pragmatics
Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issue
|
|
Page Updated: 05-Aug-2011
|
|
About LINGUIST
|
Contact Us
While the LINGUIST List makes every effort to ensure the linguistic relevance of sites listed
on its pages, it cannot vouch for their contents.
|
|