Date: 03-Sep-2011 From: Paul Peranteau <paulbenjamins.com> Subject: Communicational Criticism: Sell E-mail this message to a friend
Title: Communicational Criticism
Subtitle: Studies in literature as dialogue
Series Title: Dialogue Studies 11
Published: 2011
Publisher: John Benjamins
http://www.benjamins.com/
Author: Roger D. Sell
Electronic: ISBN: 9789027284860 Pages: Price: Europe EURO 99.00
Electronic: ISBN: 9789027284860 Pages: Price: U.S. $ 149.00
Hardback: ISBN: 9789027210289 Pages: Price: U.K. £ 99.00
Hardback: ISBN: 9789027210289 Pages: Price: U.S. $ 149.00
Hardback: ISBN: 9789027210289 Pages: Price: Europe EURO 104.94
Abstract:
Further developing the line of argument put forward in his "Literature as Communication" (2000) and "Mediating Criticism" (2001), Roger D. Sell now suggests that when so-called literary texts stand the test of time and appeal to a large and heterogeneous circle of admirers, this is because they are genuinely dialogical in spirit. Their writers, rather than telling other people what to do or think or feel, invite them to compare notes, and about topics which take on different nuances as seen from different points of view. So while such texts obviously reflect the taste and values of their widely various provenances, they also channel a certain respect for the human other to whom they are addressed. So much so, that they win a reciprocal respect from members of their audience. In Sell's new book, this ethical interplay becomes the focus of a post-postmodern critique, which sees literary dialogicality as a possible catalyst to new, non-hegemonic kinds of globalization. The argument is illustrated with major reassessments of Shakespeare, Pope, Wordsworth, Dickens, Churchill, Orwell, and Pinter, and there are also studies of trauma literature for children, and of ethically oriented criticism itself.
Linguistic Field(s):
Discourse Analysis
Ling & Literature
About LINGUIST
|
Contact Us
While the LINGUIST List makes every effort to ensure the linguistic relevance of sites listed
on its pages, it cannot vouch for their contents.