LINGUIST List 22.3706 Thu Sep 22 2011 TOC: Written Language and Literacy 14/2 (2011) Editor for this issue: Justin Petro <justinlinguistlist.org> Directory         1.     Paul Peranteau , Written Language and Literacy Vol. 14, No. 2 (2011) Message 1: Written Language and Literacy Vol. 14, No. 2 (2011) Date: 21-Sep-2011 From: Paul Peranteau <paulbenjamins.com> Subject: Written Language and Literacy Vol. 14, No. 2 (2011) E-mail this message to a friend Publisher: John Benjamins http://www.benjamins.com/ Journal Title: Written Language and Literacy Volume Number: 14 Issue Number: 2 Issue Date: 2011 Main Text: 2011. iv, 142 pp. Table of Contents Linguistic diagnostics of written texts in two school-age populations Ruth Berman, Ronit Nayditz and Dorit Ravid 161–187 Adapting to the reader during writing Eva Lindgren, Mariëlle Leijten and Luuk Van Waes 188–223 The cognitive and linguistic demands of everyday, functional literacy tasks: With application to an over-the-counter drug label Sheida White 224–250 Local dialects, supralocal writing systems: The degree of orality of Dutch private letters from the seventeenth century Gijsbert Rutten and Marijke van der Wal 251–274 The length hierarchy and the graphematic syllable: Evidence from German and English Nanna Fuhrhop, Franziska Buchmann and Kristian Berg 275–292 What linguistic units do Chinese characters represent? J. Marshall Unger 293-302 Linguistic Field(s): Applied Linguistics                             Discourse Analysis                             Historical Linguistics                             Sociolinguistics                             Writing Systems Subject Language(s): Chinese, Mandarin (cmn)                             Dutch (nld)                             English (eng)                             German (deu)                             Hebrew (heb) Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issue Page Updated: 22-Sep-2011       About LINGUIST    |   Contact Us       While the LINGUIST List makes every effort to ensure the linguistic relevance of sites listed on its pages, it cannot vouch for their contents.