LINGUIST List 22.3796
|
Thu Sep 29 2011
Diss: Anthro Ling: Nash: 'Insular Toponymies: Pristine Place-naming...'
Editor for this issue: Xiyan Wang
<xiyan linguistlist.org>
|
To post to LINGUIST, use our convenient web form at http://linguistlist.org/LL/posttolinguist.cfm.
|
Directory
1. Joshua Nash ,
Insular Toponymies: Pristine Place-naming on Norfolk Island, South Pacific and Dudley Peninsula, Kangaroo Island, South Australia
Message 1: Insular Toponymies: Pristine Place-naming on Norfolk Island, South Pacific and Dudley Peninsula, Kangaroo Island, South Australia
|
Date: 22-Sep-2011
From: Joshua Nash <joshua.nash adelaide.edu.au>
Subject: Insular Toponymies: Pristine Place-naming on Norfolk Island, South Pacific and Dudley Peninsula, Kangaroo Island, South Australia
E-mail this message to a friend
Institution: University of Adelaide
Program: European Studies and Linguistics
Dissertation Status: Completed
Degree Date: 2011
Author: Joshua Nash
Dissertation Title: Insular Toponymies: Pristine Place-naming on Norfolk Island, South Pacific and Dudley Peninsula, Kangaroo Island, South Australia
Linguistic Field(s):
Anthropological Linguistics
Dissertation Director:
Peter Mühlhäusler
Philip Baker
Michael Walsh
Dissertation Abstract:
Documenting patterns of pristine toponymy, or toponymic knowledge in locations where people remember the locations and histories of people and events associated with extant place names, is a worthwhile endeavour in linguistically pristine island environments, i.e. isolated, small island situations that have witnessed recent human habitation and that were uninhabited prior to colonisation. This study used the toponymy of Norfolk Island, South Pacific, an external territory of Australia as a main study and compared it to the toponymy of Dudley Peninsula, Kangaroo Island, South Australia. The principal research question for the study sought to establish whether the difference between official and unofficial toponyms and processes of toponymy in the two island environments was a consequence of the degree of linguistic, cultural and ecological embeddedness of these toponyms and toponymic processes. The linguistic situation on Norfolk is diglossic: English and Norf'k, the language of the descendants of the Bounty mutineers, are spoken. Norfolk is a political and cultural anomaly in Australia and its anomalous nature is depicted in the unclear boundaries not only of its human history but also in the blurring of boundaries in its toponymic history. This is a result of distinct and changing patterns of land use and differing linguistic and toponymic perceptions of the same geographical space. Dudley Peninsula is less remote and less politically and culturally anomalous than Norfolk and was selected as an island comparative study to contrast principles of unofficial toponymy with unofficial Norfolk Island toponymy. Employing a comparative method also made it possible to ascertain the extent to which a nexus and theory of pristine toponyms, transparent versus opaque toponymic histories and the official versus unofficial status of toponyms is practical across two island toponymic case studies. Primary Norfolk data were coupled with secondary archival data (n = 1068), analysed and compared to the unofficial Dudley Peninsula data (n = 253). The results of this study reveal that the differences between official and unofficial toponyms can be accounted for by the establishment of typology involving four toponym categories: (1) common colonial forms, (2) official and unofficial descriptive toponyms, (3) unofficial names commemorating local people, and (4) unofficial and esoteric names commemorating local events and people. This thesis puts forward a claim delineating a broad continuum within and between 'conscious toponymic wisdom' and 'unconscious toponymic wisdom', which is realised differently in the two locations with a tendency for more 'conscious toponymic wisdom' within Norfolk Island's toponymic ethos as compared to Dudley Peninsula's more 'unconscious toponymic wisdom'. Engaging in ecolinguistic fieldwork is a productive means to foreground the significance of local, unofficial and esoteric toponymic knowledge by working intimately with informants. In conclusion this thesis argues that the concept of insular toponymies, i.e. undertaking an analysis of toponyms based predominantly in the documentation and analysis of primary toponymic field data, was appropriate to describe the nature of toponymy in isolated and insular island societies. This study puts forward the term toponymic ethnography as a worthwhile concept within the parameters of linguistic and cultural research in toponymy.
Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issue
|
|
Page Updated: 29-Sep-2011
|
|
About LINGUIST
|
Contact Us
While the LINGUIST List makes every effort to ensure the linguistic relevance of sites listed
on its pages, it cannot vouch for their contents.
|
|