* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
LINGUIST List logo Eastern Michigan University Wayne State University *
* People & Organizations * Jobs * Calls & Conferences * Publications * Language Resources * Text & Computer Tools * Teaching & Learning * Mailing Lists * Search *
* *
LINGUIST List 22.3814

Fri Sep 30 2011

Disc: Inclusiveness Condition

Editor for this issue: Elyssa Winzeler <elyssalinguistlist.org>


To post to LINGUIST, use our convenient web form at http://linguistlist.org/LL/posttolinguist.cfm.
Directory
        1.     David Schueler , Inclusiveness Condition

Message 1: Inclusiveness Condition
Date: 27-Sep-2011
From: David Schueler <daschuelumn.edu>
Subject: Inclusiveness Condition
E-mail this message to a friend

I was wondering if anyone could help me understand why the
Inclusiveness Condition, as defined in Chomsky 1995 and other work
in the Minimalist Program, is so widely assumed as a working
hypothesis.

In most formulations, it says that in a language with optimal design, the
computational system will not add information in the course of the
derivation which is not already present in the lexical items.

My question is: why? I don't see what's so imperfect about a
computational system which adds information.

This is a separate question from whether languages in fact have this
property, since as Chomsky says many times, languages probably are
not optimally designed after all; the SMT is probably false.

But my question is, why would satisfying Inclusiveness be a criterion for
being optimal in the first place?


Linguistic Field(s): Linguistic Theories
                            Syntax





Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issue



Page Updated: 30-Sep-2011

Supported in part by the National Science Foundation       About LINGUIST    |   Contact Us       ILIT Logo
While the LINGUIST List makes every effort to ensure the linguistic relevance of sites listed on its pages, it cannot vouch for their contents.