LINGUIST List 22.3958|
Mon Oct 10 2011
FYI: Opinion on the Term 'Eco' in Multiple Languages
Editor for this issue: Elyssa Winzeler
New! Visit LL's Multitree project for over 1000 trees dynamically generated from scholarly hypotheses about language relationships:
To post to LINGUIST, use our convenient web form at http://linguistlist.org/LL/posttolinguist.cfm.
1. Anastasia O'Rourke ,
Opinion on the Term 'Eco' in Multiple Languages
Message 1: Opinion on the Term 'Eco' in Multiple Languages
From: Anastasia O'Rourke <anastasiabigroom.ca>
Subject: Opinion on the Term 'Eco' in Multiple Languages
E-mail this message to a friend
Building towards our application for .ECO - a new Top Level Domain on
the web, Big Room Inc. (www.bigroom.ca) is seeking language experts
in the official UN languages to provide ''expert opinion'' letters on the
meaning of the term: ''eco''.
- An opinion as to the accepted meaning(s) of ''eco'' in the language
(both direct and translated use)
- If the terms are used directly, what is the context? (e.g., to describe
companies, or products, or people?)
- Is eco commonly used as a pre-fix in this context? (e.g., eco-friendly)
- Are there other terms used to describe something as ''environmentally
friendly'' (like ''green'' or ''environmental'' in English)
- How common is the usage of eco in your opinion?
The languages we seek are:
- Chinese (Mandarin)
- Required by November 15, 2011
- Letter templates will be provided
- Results will form part of Big Room's application to run the .ECO
internet domain for the global sustainability community. See
www.doteco.org for more information.
- This is a voluntary (unpaid) contribution in support of the application
for .ECO. You will be credited in the application.
Dr. Anastasia O'Rourke, PhD
Co-founder, Big Room Inc.
For more information
Inquiries to: Marni Robinson marnibigroom.ca
Linguistic Field(s): General Linguistics
Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issue
Page Updated: 10-Oct-2011
While the LINGUIST List makes every effort to ensure the linguistic relevance of sites listed
on its pages, it cannot vouch for their contents.