LINGUIST List 22.3986
|
Wed Oct 12 2011
TOC: Cognitive Science 22/4 (2011)
Editor for this issue: Danniella Hornby
<daniella linguistlist.org>
|
Directory
1. Julia Ulrich ,
Cognitive Science Vol. 22, No. 4 (2011)
Message 1: Cognitive Science Vol. 22, No. 4 (2011)
|
Date: 12-Oct-2011
From: Julia Ulrich <julia.ulrich degruyter.com>
Subject: Cognitive Science Vol. 22, No. 4 (2011)
E-mail this message to a friend
Publisher: De Gruyter Mouton
http://www.degruyter.com/mouton
Journal Title: Cognitive Linguistics
Volume Number: 22
Issue Number: 4
Issue Date: 2011
Subtitle: Variation, Change and Constructions in English
Main Text:
Cognitive Linguistics Volume: 22, Number: 4 (November 2011) Variation, Change and Constructions in English The above issue is now available online at: http://www.reference-global.com/toc/cogl/2011/22/4?ai=ru&ui=w6&af=H Are infinitival to omission errors primed by prior discourse? The case of WANT constructions Minna Kirjavainen and Anna Theakston On the interpretation of alienable vs. inalienable possession: A psycholinguistic investigation Frantisek Lichtenberk, Jyotsna Vaid, and Hsin-Chin Chen Cognitive foundations of topic-comment and foreground-background structures: Evidence from sign languages, cospeech gesture and homesign Elisabeth Engberg-Pedersen Grammatical profiles and the interaction of the lexicon with aspect, tense, and mood in Russian Laura A. Janda and Olga Lyashevskaya A corpus-based account of the development of English such and Dutch zulk: Identification, intensification and (inter)subjectification Lobke Ghesquière and Freek Van de Velde A construction approach to innovative verbs in Japanese Natsuko Tsujimura and Stuart Davis
Linguistic Field(s):
Cognitive Science
Discourse Analysis
Morphology
Psycholinguistics
Semantics
Syntax
Subject Language(s): Dutch (nld)
English (eng)
Japanese (jpn)
Russian (rus)
Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issue
|
|
Page Updated: 12-Oct-2011
|
|
About LINGUIST
|
Contact Us
While the LINGUIST List makes every effort to ensure the linguistic relevance of sites listed
on its pages, it cannot vouch for their contents.
|
|