LINGUIST List 22.4060 Tue Oct 18 2011 Qs: French Word Pairs that are Not Morphological Editor for this issue: Zac Smith <zaclinguistlist.org> New! Visit LL's Multitree project for over 1000 trees dynamically generated from scholarly hypotheses about language relationships:             http://multitree.linguistlist.org/ We'd like to remind readers that the responses to queries are usually best posted to the individual asking the question. That individual is then strongly encouraged to post a summary to the list. This policy was instituted to help control the huge volume of mail on LINGUIST; so we would appreciate your cooperating with it whenever it seems appropriate. In addition to posting a summary, we'd like to remind people that it is usually a good idea to personally thank those individuals who have taken the trouble to respond to the query. To post to LINGUIST, use our convenient web form at http://linguistlist.org/LL/posttolinguist.cfm. Directory         1.     Phaedra Royle , French Word Pairs that are Not Morphological Message 1: French Word Pairs that are Not Morphological Date: 15-Oct-2011 From: Phaedra Royle <phaedra.royleumontreal.ca> Subject: French Word Pairs that are Not Morphological E-mail this message to a friend I am creating a list of French word pairs that are semantically and orthographically/phonologically similar but that are not morphologically related, such as the broil-boil pairs used by Stocakll and Marantz (2006). An example I have found in French is _couve-couvre_ 'protect-cover'. Any references to articles or discussions of this phenomenon would be appreciated. I will post a summary. Thank you. Stockall, L., & Marantz, A. (2006). A single route, full decomposition model of morphological complexity: MEG evidence. The Mental Lexicon Journal, 1(1), 85-123. Linguistic Field(s): Historical Linguistics                             Lexicography                             Morphology Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issue Page Updated: 18-Oct-2011       About LINGUIST    |   Contact Us       While the LINGUIST List makes every effort to ensure the linguistic relevance of sites listed on its pages, it cannot vouch for their contents.