LINGUIST List 22.4188
|
Tue Oct 25 2011
TOC: English Language and Linguistics 15/3 (2011)
Editor for this issue: Justin Petro
<justin linguistlist.org>
|
Directory
1. Joyce Reid ,
English Language and Linguistics Vol. 15, No. 3 (2011)
Message 1: English Language and Linguistics Vol. 15, No. 3 (2011)
|
Date: 24-Oct-2011
From: Joyce Reid <jreid cambridge.org>
Subject: English Language and Linguistics Vol. 15, No. 3 (2011)
E-mail this message to a friend
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
http://us.cambridge.org
Journal Title: English Language and Linguistics
Volume Number: 15
Issue Number: 3
Issue Date: 2011
Main Text:
Innovation in a conservative region: the Kentish Sermons genitive system Sara Myers In search of grammaticalization in synchronic dialect data: general extenders in northeast England Heike Pichler, Stephen Levey The meaning of the English present participle Liesbet Heyvaert, Hendrik de Smet 'Help' vs 'help to': a multifactorial, mixed-effects account of infinitive marker omission Arne Lohmann Testing claims of a usage-based phonology with Liverpool English t-to-r Kevin Watson, Lynn Clark Irish English: History and present-day forms. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007. Markku Filppula Corpus linguistics with BNCweb – a practical guide. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang, 2008. Matthew Brook O'Donnell Metaphor and metonymy: A diachronic approach. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell, 2008. Gerard J. Steen Phonological weakness in English: From Old to Present-Day English. Basingstoke and New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2009. Robert Fulk Publications Received Acknowledgements ELL Volume 15 Issue 3 Cover and Front Matter ELL Volume 15 Issue 3 Cover and Back Matter
Linguistic Field(s):
Historical Linguistics
Phonology
Semantics
Sociolinguistics
Syntax
Subject Language(s): English (eng)
English, Middle (enm)
English, Old (ang)
French, Old (fro)
Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issue
|
|
Page Updated: 25-Oct-2011
|
|
About LINGUIST
|
Contact Us
While the LINGUIST List makes every effort to ensure the linguistic relevance of sites listed
on its pages, it cannot vouch for their contents.
|
|