LINGUIST List 22.4211 Wed Oct 26 2011 TOC: Theoretical Linguistics 37/3-4 (2011) Editor for this issue: Justin Petro <justinlinguistlist.org> Directory         1.     Julia Ulrich , Theoretical Linguistics Vol. 37, No. 3-4 (2011) Message 1: Theoretical Linguistics Vol. 37, No. 3-4 (2011) Date: 25-Oct-2011 From: Julia Ulrich <julia.ulrichdegruyter.com> Subject: Theoretical Linguistics Vol. 37, No. 3-4 (2011) E-mail this message to a friend Publisher: De Gruyter Mouton http://www.degruyter.com/mouton Journal Title: Theoretical Linguistics Volume Number: 37 Issue Number: 3-4 Issue Date: October 2011 Subtitle: On the linguistic status of ‘agreement’ in sign languages Main Text: http://www.reference-global.com/toc/thli/2011/37/3-4?ai=12h&ui=w6&af=H On the linguistic status of ‘agreement’ in sign languages Diane Lillo-Martin and Richard P. Meier Comments Sign language verb agreement and the ontology of morphosyntactic categories Mark Aronoff and Carol Padden Very atypical agreement indeed Michael Cysouw Agreement disagreements Scott K. Liddell Prospects and challenges for a clitic analysis of (A)SL agreement Andrew Nevins When agreeing to disagree is not enough: Further arguments for the linguistic status of sign language agreement Josep Quer A featural approach to verb agreement in signed languages Christian Rathmann and Gaurav Mathur What do agreement auxiliaries reveal about the grammar of sign language agreement? Markus Steinbach Iconic Agreement Philippe Schlenker Reply Response to Commentaries: Gesture, Language, and Directionality Diane Lillo-Martin and Richard P. Meier Linguistic Field(s): Cognitive Science                             Linguistic Theories                             Morphology                             Syntax                             Typology Subject Language(s): American Sign Language (ase)                             German Sign Language (gsg) Language Family(ies): Sign Language Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issue Page Updated: 26-Oct-2011       About LINGUIST    |   Contact Us       While the LINGUIST List makes every effort to ensure the linguistic relevance of sites listed on its pages, it cannot vouch for their contents.