* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
LINGUIST List logo Eastern Michigan University Wayne State University *
* People & Organizations * Jobs * Calls & Conferences * Publications * Language Resources * Text & Computer Tools * Teaching & Learning * Mailing Lists * Search *
* *
LINGUIST List 22.4212

Wed Oct 26 2011

TOC: Language and Cognition 3/2 (2011)

Editor for this issue: Justin Petro <justinlinguistlist.org>

Directory
        1.     Julia Ulrich , Language and Cognition Vol. 3, No. 2 (2011)


Message 1: Language and Cognition Vol. 3, No. 2 (2011)
Date: 25-Oct-2011
From: Julia Ulrich <julia.ulrichdegruyter.com>
Subject: Language and Cognition Vol. 3, No. 2 (2011)
E-mail this message to a friend

Publisher: De Gruyter Mouton
http://www.degruyter.com/mouton

Journal Title: Language and Cognition
Volume Number: 3
Issue Number: 2
Issue Date: 2011


Main Text:

The above issue is now available online at:
http://www.reference-global.com/toc/langcog/2011/3/2?ai=1yw&ui=w6&af=H

Why subject relatives prevail: Constraints versus constructional licensing
Cecily Jill Duffield and Laura A. Michaelis

Metaphors in the description of seizure experiences: Common expressions and
differential diagnosis
Leendert Plug, Basil Sharrack, and Markus Reuber

From text-linguistics to literary actants – The force dynamics of (emotional)
vampirism
Michael Kimmel

Metaphor, hyperbole and simile: A pragmatic approach
Robyn Carston and Catherine Wearing

Verbs in the lexicon: Why is hitting easier than breaking?
Gail McKoon and Jessica Love

Reviews


Linguistic Field(s): Cognitive Science
                            Discourse Analysis
                            Psycholinguistics
                            Semantics
                            Syntax

Subject Language(s): English (eng)


Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issue



Page Updated: 26-Oct-2011

Supported in part by the National Science Foundation       About LINGUIST    |   Contact Us       ILIT Logo
While the LINGUIST List makes every effort to ensure the linguistic relevance of sites listed on its pages, it cannot vouch for their contents.